Performance Tuning :: Regarding Trace File And TKprof?

Apr 10, 2013

i want to know about trace file and TKPROF. any example.

View 1 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Performance Tuning :: Elapsed Time Not Accounted In Tkprof File

Jan 13, 2011

find the attached tkprof'ed file of session

I started the trace after the query started (upon user's complaint)

However even after tracing the session for more than 30 minutes I am not geeting where the 30 minutes are accounted in this file

View 11 Replies View Related

Performance Tuning :: New Trace File

Aug 11, 2011

I need to take the database trace of each page of my web application. I am giving the following commands.

BEGIN
dbms_monitor.session_trace_enable(session_id=>122, serial_num=>NULL, waits=>true, binds=>true);
END;

Accessing the web application. Once it renders completely, I am executing the following command.

BEGIN
dbms_monitor.session_trace_disable(session_id=>122);
END;

In the user_dump_dest folder, I am expecting to see a new trace whenever I execute these commands. But the same trace file is getting updated. How do I make oracle to create a new trace for each iteration. I am using Oracle 11g Release on CentOS 5.x

View 3 Replies View Related

Server Utilities :: TKPROF Cannot Open Trace File

Jan 6, 2011

I am trying to get a readable version of a .trc file generated by Oracle

10.2.0.4.0 with tkprof, but I still have been unable to get this done...and this is what I have already tried:

tkprof /u00/app/oracle/admin/DB/udump/*BITN1234.trc /batch/salidas/student/BITNTRACE.txt

And whether I run this from my PL/SQL process (PRO*C) or from a command line, it returns:

TKPROF: Release 10.2.0.4.0 - Production on Thu Jan 6 11:04:38 2011
Copyright (c) 1982, 2007, Oracle. All rights reserved.

could not open trace file /u00/app/oracle/admin/DB/udump/BITN1234.trc

I have already (from my PRO*C code and from command line)...

- made sure that the file is in the directory.
- run this from the udump directory, where the .trc file is...didn't work.
- run this from the udump directory, and specifying explicitely the

complete path anyway in the tkprof line (redundant...I know)...didn't work.

- tried to copy the file to another directory in order to run the tkprof,

and it returns:

cp: BITN1234.trc: The file access permissions do not allow the specified

action.

- tried changing privileges with:
chmod a+r BITN1234.trc

and it returns:
chmod: BITN1234.trc: Operation not permitted.

- tried to run tkprof01 instead of tkprof and it returns:

We trust you have received the usual lecture from the local System Administrator. It usually boils down to these two things:

#1) Respect the privacy of others.
#2) Think before you type.

View 3 Replies View Related

Performance Tuning :: Elapsed Time In Trace File Output

Nov 16, 2011

I executed a query which executed quickly (1.7 seconds) but since its output took time in displaying on the console the time shown by 'set timing on was 39.5 seconds

also I took trace (tkprof) for the same.My query is why the timings under 'Total Waited' (43.19 and 1.69) are not added to the elapsed time 1.83 seconds

call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Execute 1 0.00 0.06 0 10 0 0
Fetch 758 0.03 1.77 0 0 0 11345
------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
total 760 0.03 1.83 0 10 0 11345
[code]....

View 1 Replies View Related

Performance Tuning :: TKPROF Output For Session

Jun 9, 2010

understanding the TKPROF output for the session that was executing an insert statement(inserting 70 lakh data) on which a row level trigger get fired and select from following table.The trace was run for 1 hour.

Table name - > GS_MAP_RCC_CCIT

This table is having 37 rows as in on single block and having primary key index on RCC_NUM that is also contained on single block.We are getting maximum wait events on db_file_sequential_read.

As per my understanding this is due to the contention for the same block because for each row these queries get fired.

View 14 Replies View Related

Performance Tuning :: Memory Fault Error In Tkprof?

Aug 31, 2011

I am trying to run a trace file with TKPROF. It throws an error :

MEMORY FAULT

The size of the trace file is 8MB. I tried with some other file trace files bigger in size (10MB) than the above file, it works fine. I tried seeing any permission right is required on that trace file is required for the tkprof to excute, but it has got the same permissions like the other trace files.

The problem is that it is not showing any error number or any other Error Description other than "MEMORY FAULT".

View 1 Replies View Related

Performance Tuning :: Difference Between System / User Sql In Tkprof Report?

Jun 11, 2010

How can i differentiate between system issued sql's and user issued sql's in the tkprof report ?

View 5 Replies View Related

Performance Tuning :: Why There Is No Row Resource Operation Information In Tkprof Output

May 13, 2011

why there is no "Row Source Operation" information when I trace a long and complicated SQL query (It takes at least 25 minutes ro run)?

However, I can get the "Row Source Operation" information for a simple SQL Query.

Here are the tkprof output for a simple query and complicated query:

tkprof Output for a simple query
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Execute 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Fetch 13 0.00 0.00 0 16 0 173
------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
total 15 0.00 0.00 0 16 0 173

Misses in library cache during parse: 1
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 3139

Rows Row Source Operation
------- ---------------------------------------------------
173 TABLE ACCESS FULL MY_TABLE (cr=16 pr=0 pw=0 time=0 us)

Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
Event waited on Times Max. Wait Total Waited
---------------------------------------- Waited ---------- ------------
SQL*Net message to client 13 0.00 0.00
SQL*Net more data to client 24 0.00 0.00
SQL*Net message from client 13 5.33 5.47

Tkprof output for a complex query
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Parse 1 0.38 0.40 0 0 0 0
Execute 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Fetch 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
total 2 0.38 0.40 0 0 0 0

Misses in library cache during parse: 1
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 3139

No Row Source Operation information here Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
Event waited on Times Max. Wait Total Waited
---------------------------------------- Waited ---------- ------------
SQL*Net message to client 1 0.00 0.00
db file sequential read 73062 0.25 692.23
db file scattered read 16099 0.18 76.65
latch: shared pool 4 0.02 0.03
latch: cache buffers chains 3 0.04 0.04
latch free 16 0.00 0.00

View 1 Replies View Related

Performance Tuning :: How To Trace Different Session From Current With LEVEL 4

Jun 13, 2012

I've been searching the web for examples of how to run a trace.It's needed for a session different then current in trace LEVEL 4 (I need the bind variables values in the trace).

Unfortunately, I couldn't trace with DBMS_SUPPORT.START_TRACE_IN_SESSION, I understand that this is because it was only introduced in Oracle 11g.

how can i trace a session in level 4 on Oracle 10g for another session?

View 8 Replies View Related

Performance Tuning :: Script To Load Trace Files Errors To A Table?

Jul 13, 2013

I need to create a script which can fetch the error related details from Trace files regularly (may be twice a day ) to a custom table in DB.

View 3 Replies View Related

Performance Tuning :: Real Time Speed Improvements And Auto-trace Results

Feb 4, 2011

I've got a query running a select count (*) over a table. The default plan takes in the order of 15 minutes to return, a hinted plan to use a different index takes 3 minutes to return.

Unfortunately I cant get at the index stats and a few other areas which I suspect may be key here.When running autotrace against the two queries I see fairly different values as one would expect.

Query

select count (*) from fulfilmentitem bfi where created >= sysdate-30 AND bfi.status = 'FA' AND bfi.fulfilmentmethod = 'D'
Slow run
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)|
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 15 | 33119 (1)|
| 1 | SORT AGGREGATE | | 1 | 15 | |
|* 2 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| FULFILMENTITEM | 12525 | 183K| 33119 (1)|
|* 3 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | IDX_FULFIL_METHODSTATUS | 250K| | 1786 (1)|
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[code]....

IDX_FULFIL_METHODSTATUS is across FULFILMENTMETHOD & STATUS in that order.
IDX_BFI_CREATED is on CREATED and is approx 70% of the size of the other index

The row counts estimated in the explain plan are out, the count(*) comes in at 32.8k rows.As you will have seen, the fast run shows a pretty significant consistent get increase compared to the slow run and a decent though not dramatic physical read drop.

My uncertainty is around if these changes in consistent get/phys read values would typically be enough to suggest the real time improvements I'm observing or if other (albeit perhaps temporary) factors are involved. It is a prod OLTP environment so the data will be rapidly changing and that may be a factor.

I know it can never be an exact science without intimately knowing the hardware/current loads etc but I also know that there's enough experience on these boards to have a loose handle on if the time shifts between queries are likely (or not) to be reflective of the stat changes or if those differences alone shouldn't (or typically wouldn't account) for it.

I'm thinking about instructing the query to ignore its original plan but am hesitant to do so without being a little more confident that it's not just a timing thing or something other than the change of index approach which may be causing the improvement. the autotrace stat changes observed I couldn't put my hand on heart say "yup - that change is good, ignore the default index all the time for this job".

View 11 Replies View Related

Performance Tuning :: Redo Log File Size

Apr 6, 2011

The REDO log file size is important DB performance issues when DB is run archivelog mode.If DB run noarchivelog mode, REDO log file size not impact to DB performance.

View 3 Replies View Related

Performance Tuning :: Optimal REDO Log File Size

Feb 10, 2011

I would like to make a change on the live system!I have read a book and found a information about REDO log file size is impact on DB performance.My DB current log file size is 100 MB. But, Oracle 10g's Redo Logfile Sizing Advisor offer the optimal log file size is 1845 MB.What REDO log file size is best for my Oracle database?

#Optimal log file size:
select optimal_logfile_size
from v$instance_recovery
----------------------------
OPTIMAL_LOGFILE_SIZE
1842
[code]....

View 9 Replies View Related

Performance Tuning :: Used Same Dmp File To Restore Data And Settings

Oct 15, 2013

I am getting back into Oracle (from a long haul in MS only env.) and am now testing Oracle installs.I have been given a task of seeing the diff. between 12c and 10.2g...I set up 2 vms (excatly same configs) and used the same dmp file (on both env.) to restore data and settings for our jobs to run.We have some aggregated data, and cubes with DIM tables each being run on the vm machines. We run nightly jobs to rebuild our cubes.

I am supposed to see/analyze the value of 12c, and understand things might vary from company to company, but am perplexed at my result.12c is half the speed of 10.2g, both env. are the same out of the box with same dmp file and same hardware.

I am using the same dmp file, with the same jobs on each machine, with both vms having 10.2g or 12c installed out of the box as is.what default oracle settings might have changed from 10.2g to 12c that could make the exact same env. run twice as slow on the 12c?

Expectations were that out of the box with both machines running same jobs on same data (from dmp files) would have it that 10.2g would be slower than the 12c, except the 12c takes 2 times as long to run the jobs. I have reviewed every possibility as I know usually the problem is the person sitting in the chair and not the pc...but I confirmed all was identical from the one vm env. to the other, except the version of oracle out of the box.

What could be done to bring that default setting back to atleast equal time between the 2, that would give me a great starting point. Otherwise, I would have to toss this up to bloatware.

I read up a bit on the CBO, and know this might have changed in 12c.is there a way to bring it back to a backwards ealier config, so as to atleast match both env. execution plans?

View 19 Replies View Related

Performance Tuning :: Wrong REDO Log File Location

Feb 25, 2011

I try to current redo log file location to multiplex redo log configuration. I did do this on the DB.I import a backup file to DB when I made this change, but its too slow running import process from old configuration. Approximately it is 4 times slow.

when I recovery old configuration for redo log file, import process is normal running...Why this changes hit to DB import process performance? The old redo log file location is below:

GROUP#MEMBERBYTES
4"/crtest1/oradata/redo04a.log"524288000
4"/crtest1/oradata/redo04b.log"524288000
3"/crtest1/oradata/redo03a.log"524288000
3"/crtest1/oradata/redo03b.log"524288000
2"/crtest1/oradata/redo02a.log"524288000
2"/crtest1/oradata/redo02b.log"524288000
1"/crtest1/oradata/redo01a.log"524288000
1"/crtest1/oradata/redo01b.log"524288000

The new multiplex redo log file location is below:

GROUP#MEMBERBYTES
4"/crtest1/oradata/redo04a.log"524288000
4"/opt/redolog/redo04b.log"524288000
3"/opt/redolog/redo03a.log"524288000
3"/usr/redolog/redo03b.log"524288000
2"/usr/redolog/redo02a.log"524288000
2"/disk1/redolog/redo02b.log"524288000
1"/disk1/redolog/redo01a.log"524288000
1"/crtest1/oradata/redo01b.log"524288000

I think that new configuration is better for old configuration at security issue.Here is the disk partitions on the server:

-bash-3.00$ df -lh
Filesystem size used avail capacity Mounted on
/dev/dsk/c0t0d0s0 9.6G 2.2G 7.3G 23% /
/devices 0K 0K 0K 0% /devices
ctfs 0K 0K 0K 0% /system/contract
[code]....

View 4 Replies View Related

Performance Tuning :: High CPU Utilization In RAC And Log File Sequential Read Event

Apr 13, 2011

In a 3-node RAC setup; one node is showing high CPU utilization around 40~50%. The CPU utilization was less than 20% 10 days back but from 9th oldest day it jumped and consistently shows the double figure. I ran AWR reports on all three nodes and found one node with high CPU utilization and shows below tops events-

EVENT WAITS TIME(S) AVG WAIT(MS) %TOTAL CALL TIME WAIT CLASS
CPU
time 5,802 34.9

RFS
ping 15 5,118 33,671 30.8 Other

Log file sequential
read 234,831 5,036 21 30.3 System I/O

Sql*Net
more data from
client 24,1711,08745 6.5 Network

Db file sequential
read130,939 4533 2.7 User I/O

Findings:-
On AWR report(file attached) for node= sipd207; we can see that "RFS PING" wait event takes 30% of the waits and "log file sequential read" wait event takes 30% of the waits that occurs in database.

1)Are these symptoms of undersized log buffer?
2)I feel Network wait can be reduced by tweaking SDU & TDU values based on MDU.

View 2 Replies View Related

Performance Tuning :: Command To Transfer File From Local To Remote Server

Apr 21, 2011

I ran a scp command to transfer a file from local server to a remote server. when I am trying to kill the process, its giving an error.

ksh: kill: 19258: No such process

If I do a ps -ef | grep scp its showing the process running, but if i try to kill it, its showing me error.

View 7 Replies View Related

Performance Tuning :: Tools For Database Tuning And Instance Tuning

Jul 12, 2010

Looking to understand the difference between instance tuning and database tuning.

What is the difference between these two tuning exercises? I understand that an instance is memory based structures (logical) where as database consists of physical structures.

However, how does one tune a database the physical structure? Does it have to do with file placements/block sizes etc. Would you agree that a lot of that is taken care by ASM now in 11g? What tools are required/available (third party as well as oracle supplied) for these types of tuning scenarios?

View 1 Replies View Related

Getting Error In Trace File

Jul 2, 2013

I am getting below mentioned error in alertlog file very frequently.

ORA-06512: at "CTXSYS.DRUE", line 160
ORA-06512: at "CTXSYS.TEXTINDEXMETHODS", line 747
ORA-06512: at "BEE_CODE_05252013.SS_INDEX_JOB_PKG", line 496
Errors in file /beprddb/diag/rdbms/beprddb/beprddb/trace/beprddb_ora_10581.trc:
Errors in file /beprddb/diag/rdbms/beprddb/beprddb/trace/beprddb_ora_10581.trc:
Errors in file /beprddb/diag/rdbms/beprddb/beprddb/trace/beprddb_ora_10581.trc:
Tue Jul 02 15:31:15 2013
[code]....

View 1 Replies View Related

PL/SQL :: Interpreting Trace File

Jul 24, 2012

i am using 10.2.0.4.0 version of oracle.I am having trace file info as below, for one of the query. So how should i interpret the trace file? What is the issue in the query, and the scope of improvement in the query? I have removed the query and its plans from the trace file, i have only posted the wait sections.

call     count       cpu    elapsed       disk      query    current        rows
------- ------  -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------  ----------
Parse        1      0.14       0.13          0          0          1           0
Execute      1      6.63     162.12      33540      72921        383           0
Fetch    17272    178.89    1933.95     274835    3147603         20      259063
------- ------  -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------  ----------
total    17274    185.66    2096.21     308375    3220524        404      259063
[code]....

View 18 Replies View Related

Trace File Errors Interpretation

Apr 18, 2013

We are running Oracle 11.2.0.3 on a Windows 2008 R2 Server with an app server on the same. Our app has a search function that has recently started timing out on us. Sometimes intermittently but often now. I've ran a trace in our dev environment, below code, in an attempt to track down the issue but I'm finding very little useful information in relation to the errors I see in the trace file below. My experience in deciphering trace code is nill so how to interpret these errors.

*** 2013-04-18 14:27:23.353
*** SESSION ID:(3093.63097) 2013-04-18 14:27:23.353
*** CLIENT ID:() 2013-04-18 14:27:23.353
*** SERVICE NAME:(SYS$USERS) 2013-04-18 14:27:23.353
*** MODULE NAME:(w3pw.exe) 2013-04-18 14:27:23.353
*** ACTION NAME:() 2013-04-18 14:27:23.353
[code]....

View 3 Replies View Related

Generate Trace File With Required Name

Jul 26, 2013

As a sys user i want to trace a user session. so i am using 

SQL> EXEC DBMS_SYSTEM.set_sql_trace_in_session(sid=>123, serial#=>1234, sql_trace=>TRUE);SQL> EXEC DBMS_SYSTEM.set_sql_trace_in_session(sid=>123, serial#=>1234, sql_trace=>FALSE); 

to trace. but this trace file is mixing with another trace files in udump. did some Google and found that we can use

ALTER SESSION SET TRACEFILE_IDENTIFIER = "MY_TEST_SESSION".

but this will generate trace file for sys user account not for the desired user session. how we can define trace file name for desired user session trace. 

View 2 Replies View Related

RAC 10g Error Found In Trace File?

Nov 19, 2011

after apply patch 10.2.0.4 for 2 10gr2 node i tried to start asm on 2 node but i found that the 1st node (master node)
can not started but the second node is ok and this error found in trace file for lmon.trc

kjxgmpoll: terminate the CGS reconfig.
Error: KGXGN polling error (15)
error 29702 detected in background process
ORA-29702: error occurred in Cluster Group Service operation
ksuitm: waiting up to [5] seconds before killing DIAG

View 3 Replies View Related

Fetch Phase In A Trace File?

Mar 11, 2013

Oracle version: 11.2.0.3.0 Enterprise Edition
OS - IBM/AIX RISC System/6000

I am trying to generate a trace file from a piece of code executed by java server. What I asked the java developer to do is to place this block immediately after establishing a connection:

BEGIN
  EXECUTE IMMEDIATE 'ALTER SESSION SET TRACEFILE_IDENTIFIER = ''M1''';
  dbms_monitor.session_trace_enable(waits => FALSE, binds => TRUE);
END;And at the end of the logical java block of code:

BEGIN
  dbms_monitor.session_trace_disable;
END;

What I want to know is how many rows the java server fetches after executing one particular select statement, because they complain about receiving less in count rows from the select statement than expecting. For example, if I execute the same sql query in sqlplus session, then I fetch let's say 1000 rows. When the same query is executed from java side, the fetched rows are less in count, let's say 500.And because I doubt it, I wanted to trace to see what actually is executed and how.the excerpt of the trace file I see exactly the same query which I execute myself in a sqplus session.is no fine-grained control on the udnerlying tables in the query.

And my question is, how to interpret the FETCH phase of the cursor (for the select statement)?example, if I see one FETCH for this cursor, does this mean that the java server has fetched only one row?If I see 100 FETCHes, does this mean they fetched 100 rows from the cursor?

Here is a short excerpt from the trace file (don't crucify me for the query and the obvious denormalized design of the tables, this is not invented by me):

PARSING IN CURSOR #4573587152 len=667 dep=0 uid=737 oct=3 lid=737 tim=17685516462413 hv=954980718 ad='70000006d3e4940' sqlid='69pm96nwfrqbf'
select /* ordered */ o.id, nvl(o.par_id, -1) as par_id, o.NAME_GER, o.NAME_ENG, o.NAME_ESP, o.NAME_ITL,o.NAME_FRA, decode(lo.lflag, 'Y', 'L', 'N') as leaf_or_node, lo.distance + 1 as "LEVEL",  to_char(o.beg_date,

[code]...

View 5 Replies View Related

Swap Information Shows Zero In Trace File

Nov 8, 2010

I got the below message in trace file. What does the line "swap info: free = 0.00M alloc = 0.00M total = 0.00M" trying to say?

I have

RAM=1.5G
Swap=3.5G

Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.1.0 - Production With the Partitioning, OLAP and Data Mining options ORACLE_HOME = /home/oracle
System name:Linux
Node name:linuxdev
Release:2.6.5-7.97-default
Version:#1 Fri Jul 2 14:21:59 UTC 2004

[Code]....

View 1 Replies View Related

Invisible Index Getting Accessed In Trace File 11g

Jun 16, 2011

I am working on tuning the performance of one of the concurrent request in our 11i ERP System having database 11.1.0.7

I had enabled oradebug trace for the request and generated tkprof out of it. For below query which is taking time , I found that , in the trace generated , wait event is "db file sequential read" on an PO_LINES_N10 index but in the generated tkprof , for the same below query , the full table scan for PO_LINES_ALL is happening , as that table is 600 MB in size.

Below is the query ,
===============
UPDATE PO_LINES_ALL A
SET A.VENDOR_PRODUCT_NUM = (SELECT SUPPLIER_ITEM FROM APPS.IRPO_IN_BPAUPDATE_TMP C WHERE BATCH_ID = :B1 AND PROCESSED_FLAG = 'P' AND ACTION = 'UPDATE' AND C.LINE_ID =A.PO_LINE_ID AND ROWNUM = 1 AND SUPPLIER_ITEM IS NOT NULL),
LAST_UPDATE_DATE = SYSDATE
===============

Index PO_LINES_N10 is on the column LAST_UPDATE_DATE , logically for such query , index should not have got used as that indexed column is not in select / where clause.

Also, why there is discrepancy between tkprof and trace generated for the same query .

So , I decided to INVISIBLE the index PO_LINES_N10 but still that index is getting accessed in the trace file .

I have also checked the below parameter , which is false so optimizer should not make use of invisible indexes during query execution.

SQL> show parameter invisible

NAME TYPE VALUE
----------- optimizer_use_invisible_indexes boolean FALSE

View 5 Replies View Related

Row Lock Contention - Trace File Shared

Nov 19, 2012

I am having enq: TX - row lock contention in top wait event. it is occurring between 10pm - 2am.

We are having sqlloader job running every one hour(conventional path). But for the specific period of time i am getting "Global Enqueue Services Deadlock detected". Between 10-5. I analyzed related trace file it is make me little confusion.I found there are four insert query culprit for this locking. out of four sql , tow of them are ran by same SID, other two insert ran by same id. I got confused because how same sid locking them self. trace file below. during this period oracle maintenance window is active.

Trace file:

*** 2012-10-09 03:40:31.135
user session for deadlock lock 0x15365e060
sid: 1104 ser: 22256 audsid: 8797820 user: 49/iurth flags: 0x45
pid: 71 O/S info: user: oracle, term: UNKNOWN, ospid: 8601
image: oracle@sgh0909
client details:
[code]....

View 3 Replies View Related

Trace File - MVs Failed (ORA-10980 Error Encountered)

Oct 19, 2010

In Trace file I am always geeting one error "Error encountered: ORA-10980" due to which MVs fails . how to overcome from this error?

View 2 Replies View Related

Windows :: Unable To Delete SMON Trace File?

Oct 4, 2012

In my database smon tracefile was huge,now we want to delete the same,I also tried with ordebug operation but no use, delete tracfile which Smon generates.

View 5 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved