There are 2 setup of Oracle DB 9.2.0.8.0. There is a table T1 in both (one that is working 6.5 million rows and the other that is not working having 6.7 million rows). while doing - select * from t1 order by c1 desc; one is using index i1 and other is going for full table access.
View 1 Replies
What should be the order of columns while creating b-tree non-unique index.
Low cardinality first
or
Hight cardinality first
Does ascending index ensures that query without order by will have the result set sorted?
E.g. the query is
select * from table_t where odm_type='I' and odm_uid>nvl(OpUidParm,-1);
column odm_type has index created like this (default is ASC):
create index ODM_UID_I on table_t (ODM_UID);
Will such a query always return the first record having the minimal odm_uid in all Oracle versions?
I came across situation where a Nullable column is not using index for 'order by' clause. I added Not Null condition in the 'where' condition but it wasn't useful. I don't wanted to make composite index with not nullable column or with constant or modify column to 'Not Null'
So I carried out test cases and during which I found that in one case the sql statement does 'fast full scan' for data access but does not use index for 'order by' sorting
here are the steps
Initially I kept the column Nullable
SQL> create sequence s5;
Sequence created.
SQL> create table t5 as select s5.nextval id,a.* from dba_objects a where rownum<1001;
Table created.
SQL> set pages 100
SQL> select column_name,nullable from user_tab_columns where table_name='T5';
SQL> create index i5 on t5(id);
Index created.
SQL> exec dbms_stats.gather_table_stats(user,'T5',cascade=>true);
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
exit
SQL> alter session set events '10046 trace name context forever, level 12';
select *
from
t5 where id is not null order by id
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Execute 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Fetch 68 0.00 0.00 0 16 0 1000
------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
total 70 0.01 0.00 0 16 0 1000
Misses in library cache during parse: 1
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 5
Rows Row Source Operation
------- ---------------------------------------------------
1000 SORT ORDER BY (cr=16 pr=0 pw=0 time=4771 us)
1000 TABLE ACCESS FULL T5 (cr=16 pr=0 pw=0 time=1157 us)
Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
Event waited on Times Max. Wait Total Waited
---------------------------------------- Waited ---------- ------------
SQL*Net message to client 68 0.00 0.00
SQL*Net message from client 68 49.49 49.72
********************************************************************************
select /*+ index(t i5) */ *
from
t5 t where id is not null order by id
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Execute 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Fetch 68 0.00 0.00 0 150 0 1000
------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
total 70 0.00 0.00 0 150 0 1000
Misses in library cache during parse: 1
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 5
Rows Row Source Operation
------- ---------------------------------------------------
1000 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID T5 (cr=150 pr=0 pw=0 time=5167 us)
1000 INDEX FULL SCAN I5 (cr=71 pr=0 pw=0 time=3141 us)(object id 4673065)
Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
Event waited on Times Max. Wait Total Waited
---------------------------------------- Waited ---------- ------------
SQL*Net message to client 69 0.00 0.00
SQL*Net message from client 69 22.89 28.04
Now I modified the 'id' column to Not Null
SQL> alter table t5 modify id not null;
SQL> set pages 100
SQL> select column_name,nullable from user_tab_columns where table_name='T5';
COLUMN_NAME N
------------------------------ -
ID N
OWNER Y
OBJECT_NAME Y
SUBOBJECT_NAME Y
OBJECT_ID Y
DATA_OBJECT_ID Y
OBJECT_TYPE Y
CREATED Y
LAST_DDL_TIME Y
TIMESTAMP Y
STATUS Y
TEMPORARY Y
GENERATED Y
SECONDARY Y
14 rows selected.
select *
from
t5 order by id
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Parse 1 0.00 0.01 0 29 0 0
Execute 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Fetch 68 0.00 0.00 0 16 0 1000
------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
total 70 0.01 0.01 0 45 0 1000
Misses in library cache during parse: 1
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 5
Rows Row Source Operation
------- ---------------------------------------------------
1000 SORT ORDER BY (cr=16 pr=0 pw=0 time=2398 us)
1000 TABLE ACCESS FULL T5 (cr=16 pr=0 pw=0 time=1152 us)
Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
Event waited on Times Max. Wait Total Waited
---------------------------------------- Waited ---------- ------------
SQL*Net message to client 68 0.00 0.00
SQL*Net message from client 68 37.74 37.91
********************************************************************************
select /*+ index(t i5) */ *
from
t5 t order by id
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Execute 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Fetch 68 0.00 0.00 0 150 0 1000
------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
total 70 0.00 0.00 0 150 0 1000
Misses in library cache during parse: 1
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 5
Rows Row Source Operation
------- ---------------------------------------------------
1000 TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID T5 (cr=150 pr=0 pw=0 time=4166 us)
1000 INDEX FULL SCAN I5 (cr=71 pr=0 pw=0 time=3142 us)(object id 4673065)
Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
Event waited on Times Max. Wait Total Waited
---------------------------------------- Waited ---------- ------------
SQL*Net message to client 68 0.00 0.00
SQL*Net message from client 68 8.28 8.45
select id
from
t5 order by id
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Execute 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Fetch 68 0.00 0.00 0 6 0 1000
------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
total 70 0.00 0.00 0 6 0 1000
Misses in library cache during parse: 1
Optimizer mode: ALL_ROWS
Parsing user id: 5
Rows Row Source Operation
------- ---------------------------------------------------
1000 SORT ORDER BY (cr=6 pr=0 pw=0 time=1342 us)
1000 INDEX FAST FULL SCAN I5 (cr=6 pr=0 pw=0 time=1093 us)(object id 4673065)
Elapsed times include waiting on following events:
Event waited on Times Max. Wait Total Waited
---------------------------------------- Waited ---------- ------------
SQL*Net message to client 68 0.00 0.00
SQL*Net message from client 68 1.88 1.89
Questions are
1) Why adding 'where id is not null wasn't enough for the index to get used in 'order by'?
2) While we got 'fast full scan' why index wasn't used for 'order by' clause?
3) Do we need the indexed column in where clause for being used in 'order by clause' too?
4) Do we need 'order by' clause if we are selecting only the indexed column with sequence generated values?
For whatever reason, in PHP, DESC statements do not work. They're simply unrecognized and you get an OCI "invalid SQL statement" error. It may be some sort of security feature. I've also had the same result with the SQL scratchpad in the Java EM, but not in SQL Plus. Is there an alternative method for getting details on a table that I can use that also doesn't require being logged in as a SYSDBA?
View 5 Replies View RelatedI am a newbie to Oracle and trying to write something to basically loop through all tables and do a DESC for each table,
I have the following code
set serveroutput on
begin
FOR cursor1 IN (SELECT * FROM ALL_TABLES where OWNER='ABC' ORDER BY TABLE_NAME)
LOOP
DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE(cursor1.TABLE_NAME);
FOR cursor2 IN (select * from cols where TABLE_NAME=cursor1.TABLE_NAME ORDER BY COLUMN_NAME)
LOOP
DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE(cursor2.COLUMN_NAME);
END LOOP;
END LOOP;
end;
Although the above code works, I would like to have the DESC TABLE_NAME instead of just displaying the column name so I can see the properties of the column.
I couldn't get the DESC part to work
I am working on ORACLE 9I. I am ordering(ASC/DES) the data one column whose values are
SALES-1
SALES-14
SALES-15
SALES-2
SALES-3
SALES-11
SALES-12
SALES-13
SALES-4
SALES-5
When i do the ascending order dat looks like
SALES -1
SALES-11
SALES-12
SALES-13
SALES-14
SALES-15
SALES-2
SALES-3
SALES-4
SALES-5
but it should display as
SALES-1
SALES-2
SALES-3
SALES-4
SALES-5
SALES-11
SALES-12
SALES-13
SALES-14
SALES-15
if you grant select on a table to a user then u revoke select on this table that user still can desc this table, is this ok? what if i don't want that user to desc it?
View 2 Replies View Relatedhow to use desc inside pl sql block?
View 16 Replies View RelatedWhich step in the following plan is the first step of execution
I reckon it is "TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| BANK_BATCH_STATE"
Is that correct?
In the "Predicate Information (identified by operation id):"
section the predicates - access and filter for the step "TABLE ACCESS FULL | PYMNT_DUES" are displayed first
Isn't there any relation between the order of execution steps and the order in which predicates are displayed?
Execution Plan
----------------------------------------------------------
Plan hash value: 538700484
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 2364 | 15 (14)| 00:00:01 |
|* 1 | FILTER | | | | | |
| 2 | HASH GROUP BY | | 1 | 2364 | 15 (14)| 00:00:01 |
| 3 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 2364 | 14 (8)| 00:00:01 |
| 4 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 2313 | 13 (8)| 00:00:01 |
| 5 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 2281 | 12 (9)| 00:00:01 |
| 6 | NESTED LOOPS OUTER | | 1 | 2255 | 11 (10)| 00:00:01 |
|* 7 | HASH JOIN | | 1 | 175 | 6 (17)| 00:00:01 |
|* 8 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | INDX_2 | 12 | 612 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 9 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | PYMNT_DUES | 43 | 5332 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 10 | VIEW PUSHED PREDICATE | | 1 | 2080 | 5 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 11 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 154 | 5 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 12 | NESTED LOOPS | | 1 | 103 | 4 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 13 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| BANK_BATCH_STATE | 1 | 32 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 14 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | INDX_BBS_1 | 3 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 15 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| DAILY_CHECK | 1 | 71 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 16 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | INDX_SEARCH | 1 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 17 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | INDX_2 | 1 | 51 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 18 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | INDX_IAM_SR_NO | 1 | 26 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 19 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | INDX_2 | 1 | 32 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
|* 20 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | INDX_2 | 1 | 51 | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
-----------------------------------------------------------------
I have below tables,
describe rpthead
Name Null Type
--------------------------- -------- -------------
RPTNO NOT NULL NUMBER
RPTDATE NOT NULL DATE
RPTD_BY NOT NULL VARCHAR2(25)
PRODUCT_ID NOT NULL NUMBER
describe rptbody
Name Null Type
------------- -------- -------------
RPTNO NOT NULL NUMBER
LINENO NOT NULL NUMBER
COMMENTS VARCHAR2(240)
UPD_DATE DATE
The fact is that we store some header in RPTHEAD and store real data in RPTBODY, the question is that if I use below SQL to query all data for a 'PRODUCT_ID'.
SELECT t0.LINENO, t0.COMMENTS, t0.RPTNO, t0.UPD_DATE
FROM RPTBODY t0 , RPTHEAD rpthead
WHERE
(
t0.RPTNO = rpthead.RPTNO
AND
t0.UPD_DATE>=to_date('1970/01/01 00:00:00','YYYY/MM/DD hh24:mi:ss')
AND
rpthead.PRODUCT_ID IN ('4647')
)
I do not want to have 'ORDER by' clause since data set is too large, the sorting takes long time, is there any way to get the result rows in the order sorted by RPTNO? We have the index for RPTNO on RPTBODY.
I have a table (emp) with three columns in ORACLE:
COMPANY OFFICE EMP
------------------------
9999 00001 emp1
9999 00001 emp2
9999 00002 emp3
9999 00002 emp4
[code]...
I want to get value in EMP column with following statement:
-------------
SELECT
EMP
FROM
emp
ORDER BY COMPANY (But 9999 is first), OFFICE (But 99999 is first).
-------------
I don't know how to do.
I know the only way to guarantee a specific sort order result when querying table is by using the order by clause. However, I have an issue where I do not have access to the code for the web user interface of a very lightly used interface (has two users). In that user interface is a drop down box that is populated by a table - one table. The drop down box is populated by the query "select [column name] from [table name]". Right now there are 400+ rows in that table total, so it's small but not having the items ordered is a pain.
I would like to alter something on the db side so the result of "select [column name] from [table name]" is an ordering by the column descending. I don't want the sort order to be the same for all queries (including joins and all) just want to control the order for that one query. It is Oracle9i.
I have migrated from Oracle 8i (8.1.7) to Oracle 10g, but when I execute a query in 8i without any order by clause, I get a result in ascending order. The same query when executed in 10g gives a result which is not ordered. How to get an order result in 10g. There are many forms and reports which use lov which are not ordered. Can I set the ordering at the database, so that I do not have to alter all the forms and reports.
I have also migrated my forms from 5 to 6, but the combo box in some forms in 6i do not appear at run time. How I can solve this problem. I have attached an forms5 .fmb file/.
I have two block....both are the control block.. in first block i select the date and in second block the data of that date is populated.but the data is populated using cursor in when-button-pressed trigger of that first block button.in cursor the data is selected and placed in field of detail block using into clause.... each field and one item of detail block is srno which is create in post-query of detail block using :sysyem.trigger_record.
Now i want after populated the detail block the data is sorted desc one of the field of the detail block..Can this possible using set_block_property() of block although the block is control block if yes where i should do this?
Is there a way to short a Matrix report? The query shorts correctly in PLSQL but not in the generated report file.
There are columns like Date,Device,Operator Id etc and the report should be able to short depending on the requirement. For example,
it should be able to short by device, or by Date or both. I tried sorting in the 'Break order' but doesn't come out as required.
We have Oracle DB 11g.I want to develop a small application for internal use the company.I have used Oracle Application Express workspace provided by Oracle and I thought of using Oracle Apex is the right tool for our internal reporting.
But I am not sure what is needed in order to start developing the application in-house.What should I check with the DBA team in order to find out if I can use Oracle APEX in the organization.Is there any prerequisites, web Server, etc that is needed in order to use Oracle Apex?
I am on 11.2.0.3 Enterprise Edition. We are using the new feature "Composite Domain Index" for a Domain index on a very large table (>250.000.000 rows). It really works with mixed queries. We added two number columns using FILTER BY.We have lots of DML on this table. Therefore, we are executing synchronize and optimize once the week. The synch behaves pretty normal. But "optimize_index" takes a very very long time to complete. I have switsched on 'logging' for the optimize process. The $I table takes some time but is finished normally. But the optimization of the $S table (that is the table created for the CDI feature) is running over 12 hours now - and far from being finished. From the logfile, I can see that it optimizes 1000 rows every 20 minutes. Here is the output of the logfile:
Oracle Text, 11.2.0.3.0
14:33:05 06/26/12 begin logging
14:33:05 06/26/12 event
14:33:05 06/26/12 process $N for optimize: SEQDEV.GEN_GES_DESCRIPTION_CTX_I
14:33:16 06/26/12
14:33:16 06/26/12
[code]....
I haven't found a recommendation from Oracle not to use "optimize_index" for Domain Indexes with CDI. But in my case, it would be much faster just to drop and recreate the Domain Index in question.
I have a huge table (about 60 gb) partition over range. The index on this table is global index created on 4 columns together. I have a query which is running very slowly. The explain plan is showing the use of this global index.Explain plan is not showing pstart and pend because the index is global.
View 6 Replies View RelatedI have a global index and I want to convert it to local index.Is there a way to recreate local index with out dropping the global index.
I can create a local index first and then drop the global index. But is there a way to create it with out dropping the global index, just convert it.
I read about many indexes as B tree index, function based index,Bitmap Index etc.how many types of Index are there in Oracle and what are they? wat are the categories and sub category? when to use what?
View 6 Replies View RelatedBelow Table Index are rebuild,This table are relation with sys user or not?after rebuild index, getting error in alert log file
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [psdnop-1], [1410], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], []
ORA-01410: invalid ROWID
when trying to select * from dba_network_acls getting error massage Rowid invalid
ALTER INDEX CTXSYS.SYS_C003684 REBUILD;
ALTER INDEX CTXSYS.SYS_C003683 REBUILD;
ALTER INDEX CTXSYS.SYS_C003682 REBUILD;
ALTER INDEX CTXSYS.SYS_C003681 REBUILD;
[code]...
It is possible to recreate this index again.......
Types of oracle index in detail. consider this situation, if a select query without any where clause takes much time to get data,then we will create index for that table.
Now again run the same select query. this time, whether the query takes much time again or will it work fast? whether the index is used for a select query execution or not?
How we can confirm that whether the oracle using the index normally?
I am facing the error "ORA-01502: index or partition of such index is in unusable state " while loading the text data using
sql loader with direct path (direct = Y ,rows = 10000) option. Table consists an composite non unique index. If I query the dba indexes for the effected index it shows the index status as VALID. There was no maintaince done on the effected table or index. I have tried loading the same data using conventional path but didn't found any issues for the same.
I have a query which had a join:
a.c1=b.c1 and a.c2=@var
where @var is user supplied input at runtime...We had a index on a.c2 . The CBO would use this index to generate an opitimised query plan.We found some records from table "b" were dropping due to inner join. So we made a change in join. It'd be like
a.c1(+)=b.c1 and nvl(a.c2,@var)=@var
This query is no longer using the index, instead its doing a full table scan causing the query to slowdown.I have tried creating index on nvl(a.c2,'31-dec-9999')
But the CBO won't use it.Anyway to create index on this col so that full table scan can be avoided?
How to force an index if the table not using the index?
View 10 Replies View RelatedWe have occurrences of enq : TX - index contentions in the database. Using the SQL ID, we have identified the INSERT statement and the table which they are trying to insert.
This table has almost 25 different indexes, some of which are unique as well.I am wondering how to identify the actual index causing issue, out of these 25 indexes.
Is there any way to pin point to the name of index which is causing the lock?My plan is, once the index is identified, I would like to check the extents and inittrans and other attributes of this index to fix.
i have table (MEN) with 900,000 records.in this table i have field `IP` and `Tdate`.when i run query:
select * from MEN where IP = '1.1.1.1' and Tdate = TO_DATE('07/04/2010', 'DD/MM/YYYY')
it takes long time until i get Result.i try to make index like this:
create index
my_in
on
MEN (IP,Tdate );
but how to run the query to get fast Result?i try this:
select My_in from MEN where IP = '1.1.1.1' and Tdate = TO_DATE('07/04/2010', 'DD/MM/YYYY')
and get error: `ORA-00904`
I have a SQL query where I am making UNION of two select statements. The table that I am joining in each select statement have indexes defined for those tables.
Now the UNION of the two select statements again in enclosed in an inline view , from which I fetching my final field values.
The select statements inside the inline view returns huge number of row (like 50 million rows).
The whole query fails with time out.
How can I optimize this query further?
Is there a way to pass Oracle Hints so that Oracle uses indexes?
I have a table which if approc 5GB in size.I am trying to create a partition table from it. I created the new table,but when i am creating local indexes, i am getting an error when i create a unique key. I ll post the creation scripts:
CREATE TABLE A_PT_ORDREG
(
BUS_UNIT VARCHAR2(5) NOT NULL,
ORDER_NO VARCHAR2(15) NOT NULL,
PT_CODE VARCHAR2(15) NOT NULL,
REG_NO VARCHAR2(15) NOT NULL,
AS_APPLICATION VARCHAR2(5) NOT NULL,
[code].....
THE INDEX:
CREATE UNIQUE INDEX PK_A_PT_ORDREG ON A_PT_ORDREG (BUS_UNIT, ORDER_NO, SEQ_NO) local;
I am getting the following error:
ORA-14039: partitioning columns must form a subset of key columns of a UNIQUE index
