on 11G R2,
We want to grant truncate any table to a user.
How ?
We should create the following procedure ?
1. Create the procedure to truncate the table.
create or replace procedure truncate_table (
table_name varchar2,
storage_type varchar2)
[Code]....
grant execute on <procedure_name> to <user>Is it for only one table ? If yes how to do that for all tables ? Or the tables of a schema ?
I have two user a and b. I have to Grant select update insert Delete Permission to all tables of user b To User a. how can it possible?
View 5 Replies View Relatedi need to grant a user to see all table into another table and not to use this option (grant any table)
View 9 Replies View RelatedI have two users say A and B. I have all the tables,views,indexes, types,procedures,packages etc. User B wants to access all the objects from user A.
View 4 Replies View RelatedI would like to know what happens when we fire:
grant all on any table to user_name;
and
grant all on table_name to user_name;
Actually I was performing "grant all on table_name to user_name;" to grant the privilege but 1 of my friends suggested "grant all on any table to user_name;"
I want to perform something like -
Conn xyz/passwordxyz
grant create procedure to 'xyz';
I want to give permissions to my current user 'xyz' , I am able to give permissions to user using system user but Is there any way to grant permissions to user 'xyz' while I am using 'xyz' user.
I am trying to create a script where a user can be granted all the roles that another user has. I created a script:
create user yyyyy identified by zzzz default tablespace ahspace temporary tablespace temp_data;
grant connect to yyyyy;
declare
cursor grantpriv is
select granted_role from dba_role_privs where grantee='xxxxx'; -- existing user
cursor_name integer;
statement varchar2(200);
Begin
cursor_name :=dbms_sql.open_cursor;
[Code]....
I am a java developer and would like to install data locally in my computer for testing purpose.
I login as sysdba in sqlplus, created a user.
In the installation documentation it said :
This user should have at least the following privileges.
CREATE TABLE, CREATE VIEW, CREATE PROCEDURE, CREATE PUBLIC SYNONYM, CREATE USER, CREATE ROLE, CREATE SEQUENCE, CREATE SESSION CREATE TRIGGER, AND CREATE TYPE.
If you choose, you can grant DBA role to this user.
Note: Coeus Schema owner should have CREATE USER and ALTER USER right explicitly granted to it, not through a role like DBA.
1)How to grant all this prvileges to that user ?
2)How this user will have CREATE USER and ALTER USER right explicitly granted to it, not through a role like DBA ?
I have a procedure in my schema. I have created a sys context name xyz for passing the date in that i am passing the sysdate to that context which is used in a view.i have used/called that procedure in form.
My problem is that when i am giving Grant select any dictionary to the user then form is compiled otherwise form is giving error procedure name must be declared. But for security reasons i don't to give select any dictionary to that user.
grant insert,update,delete,select on staging_tb1 to public;
What is public here? i know something about public user like it is users exist in the database .
I have a role in my Oracle 10g instance like below:
GRANT ALTER USER TO <role_name> WITH ADMIN OPTION;
And this works fine for any user who has:
GRANT <role_name> TO <user>;
What I need is to limit <user> to only have the ALTER USER privilege to a set of users. Preferrably where the set of users are identified by a column value in a table, something like:
WHERE PeopleTable.InList = "YES"
Or maybe where set of users are defined by their membership in another role.
GRANT ALTER USER TO <role_name> FOR USERS IN MEMBERS_LIST_ROLE;
i have to grant permission to a user on a package dbms_transaction.After i granted permission i am getting error:
ORA-01031: insufficient privileges
ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_TRANSACTION", line 88
ORA-06512: at line 1
I have a table that has 2 columns of type nested table. Now in the purge process, when I try to truncate or drop a partition from this table, I get error that I can't do this (because table has nested tables). how I will be able to truncate/drop partition from this table? IF I change column types from nested table to varray type, will it work?
Also, is there any short method of moving existing data from a nested table column to a varray column (having same fields as nested table)?
The Scenario is that we have Master and detail table (With Foreign key enabled), we want to TRUNCATE Master table.
1) Is there any option which can Truncate the table without disabling the constraints for child tables...we want to Truncate the table forcefully..
2) What will be best method to truncate a Table having Master detail relation (Foreign key enabled) and we need to truncate the table without disabling the constraint ( if there are records in child table)
3) What will be best method to truncate a Table having Master detail relation (Foreign key enabled) and we need to truncate the table without disabling the constraint ( if there are NO records in child table
i need to import into table A. Before that i will do a truncate.
I will disable the constraint.
DO i need to disable any triggers on the table before importing?
I have table t1 and t1 , I want a procedure that will insert all records from t1 into table t2 and after successfull insert table t1 should be truncated .
If their is any problem in insert in to table t2 , the truncate command should not work .
Truncate command should work only after successfully insert command .
I am trying to Truncate the table but it doesnt get truncated. When I issue the command it even doesnt throw the error. I also tried to drop the table but cant even able to drop the table. I thought table might be locked. But it allows me delete a row from the table.
I am using Oracle 11g Release 11.1.0.7.0
I couldn't either DROP or TRUNCATE the table partitions that were created. Here are the DDLs and DMLs I'm using.
Create table student(no number(2),name varchar(2)) partition by range(no) (partition
p1 values less than(10), partition p2 values less than(20), partition p3 values less
than(30),partition p4 values less than(40));
Insert into student values(1,'a');
Insert into student values(11,'b');
Insert into student values(21,'c');
Insert into student values(31,'d');
When I do the following query, it returns data.
SELECT * FROM STUDENT PARTITION(p1);
But, when I try to perform any of the following queries, it says invalid partition name.
ALTER TABLE STUDENT DROP PARTITION p4;
ALTER TABLE STUDENT TRUNCATE PARTITION p3;
I am using Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.3.0 - 64bit
Our DB is 11g and approximately, how much time it takes and do we need to rebuild indexes after truncate?
View 5 Replies View Relatedif a user have alter table gant but could not alter .. what additional grant it need
SQL> alter table HRS_PERS_FIELDS_INC modify(PER0000252 NUMBER(19,3));
alter table HRS_PERS_FIELDS_INC modify(PER0000252 NUMBER(19,3))
*
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-00942: table or view does not exist
I have a schema TEST1 and it has a view 'TEST_VIEW'. I granted read only permission on the view to TEST2 schema. grant select on TEST_VIEW to TEST2.
But TEST2 is used by an application which requires to read view metadata and then sync with application afterwords start reading. Is there any special permission to grant to access metadata of the view / table.
Our client has this scenario:May 23th 4:00 PM a user truncate a critical table. The customer need to recover the data before truncate.
The recover materials list like this:
1. A cold backup of this database at May 1th.
2. The archive log except May 1th ~ May 15th.
3. Every day exp at 00:30 and 12:00.
Is there any way to recover the data before truncate table with these material?
Are there redo generate during truncate operation even my primary database is in FORCE LOGGGING mode? How this will effect on physical standby database.
View 6 Replies View RelatedAny impact is there if is do the following:
ALTER TABLE MY_TABLE TRUNCATE PARTITION P1 UPDATE GLOBAL INDEXES;
will there be any lock on the table during this operation? DML operations will work without any issue or not?
I want to grant a privilege through an insert statement into a sys table.Why do not grant the privilege through the classic way : grant select on t to l_user; ?
Because I want to do it remotely.I am connected to db1.I want to grant select on t2 to u2_b from u2_a.I assume that all DDL are DML. So a grant is equivalent "somewhere" to an insert.I tried to do my requirement locally, and here is the output.
SQL> conn scott/aa
Connecté.
SQL> -- step 1 : try to grant "normally" a select on dept to hr from scott
SQL> grant select on dept to hr;
Autorisation de privilèges (GRANT) acceptée.
SQL>
SQL> conn sys/a as sysdba
Connecté.
SQL> -- step 2 : Then, we connect to sys to see the row inserted in dba_tab_privs
SQL>
SQL> col GRANTEE format A10
SQL> col OWNER format A10
[code]...
Then if I can do it locally, I can do it remotely through a db link.
The SELECT at the end of this script fails with "ORA-00942: table or view does not exist". I think I added proper permission via GRANT command.
create table mudd_table (
a number,
b varchar2(10)
);
create user mudd_user identified by mudd_user;
grant select, insert, update, delete on mudd_table to mudd_user;
grant create session to mudd_user;
conn mudd_user/mudd_user@quadoracle;
select * from mudd_table;
My requirement is to to truncate the table and load it with the data present in file. In the control file, I used the "TRUNCATE" command as well.In case, if the file has some invalid data and sqlldr fails, my existing data will be lost. Is there any option in which the sqlldr does not TRUNCATE the table in case of a failure.
View 6 Replies View RelatedI ran into an issue in a project where a function is recreating an index-organized table by doing:Table Structure:
CREATE TABLE table_iot(
...)
ORGANIZATION INDEX
OVERFLOW ...;
Recreate Steps:
1) Populate global temporary staging table (gtt) with data
-- where gtt is staging for target index-organized table (iot)
2) Lock the target index-organized table (iot)
3) Copy old iot data to gtt
-- gtt now contains old and new data
4) Create new index-organized table (iot2) from gtt
-- iot2 now contains old and new data
[code]...
Because index-organized tables are primarily stored in a B-tree index, you can encounter fragmentation as a consequence of incremental updates. However, you can use the ALTER TABLE...MOVE statement to rebuild the index and reduce this fragmentation.The following statement rebuilds the index-organized table admin_docindex:
ALTER TABLE admin_docindex MOVE;
I am trying to write an update statement which updates the User IDs in one table with the User IDs in another table. However I need to update statement to ignore any duplicates that are in the tables.
View 4 Replies View RelatedI stumbled about some weird 11gR2 behavior (running on AIX).When I performed a join between a table with user based content (parts belonging to an sourcing scope) and a base table (parts available) whereas the parts have to fulfill a special regular expression, it showed that the same query is faster when using outer join than inner join (about 0.7sec vs. 20sec; which makes me believe that regexp_like works wrong when involved in an inner join).
i tried the same statement with a standard like (but not fulfilling the same condition).This time performance was as expected (inner join outperforming outer join).
Oracle version information
Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.2.0 - 64bit Production
PL/SQL Release 11.2.0.2.0 - Production
CORE 11.2.0.2.0 Production
TNS for IBM/AIX RISC System/6000: Version 11.2.0.2.0 - Production
NLSRTL Version 11.2.0.2.0 - Production
[code]...
I can see it, the execution plan for the "inner join" doesn't show so much more costs than the one for the outer (but why at all is does an inner join cost more?) ...The execution plan for both "not like" is the same and (surprisingly ;-) ) similar to "outer-regexp".
I hope sample data are not needed as there would be needed a lot...this is the second time I came across the "plan worse but execution time better" phenomenon.
