All my sys tables are very slow after my database upgrade from 10.2.0.4 to 11.2.0.3 on AIX 6.1
For example
select * from ALL_TAB_COLUMNS; -- taking 19 seconds in 11.2.0.3 and few millisec in 10.2.0.4
I have deleted and updated fixed and dictionary table statistics , till I facing this issue
find reference note IDs for DB upgrade from 11.2.0.2 to 11.2.0.3.2, as I am finding only Exadata which I don't want but I want to find for Ebiz database, on OS - Solaris 10 9/10 s10s_u9wos_14a SPARC.
View 1 Replies View RelatedAlong with existing RMAN backups we do Exports - of our DB using and OS User and Oracle Wallet.Of the DB's we have upgraded the Data Pump Directory
Select * from dba_directories; (there are other commands to get this info as well).
I captured screens from the DBUA upgrades, but did not see an option to change this information.Is there a way to feed this information to the install moving forward. IE, ./DBUA -silent ?
Also, anyone tracked the percentage of storage increase from 10.2/11.1 to 11.2.
We have a function that is called in various other PL/SQL packages, and performance has always been very good. On 29th Sept we upgraded our db to 10.2.0.5.0 and since then, a package that calls the function has gone from ~4mins, to ~2.5hrs to run.
In PL/SQL Developer, a simple select that calls the function has gone from ~0.5secs to retrieve the first 100 rows, to ~12secs. I ran a profile of the main package, which highlighted the where the bottleneck was (a fetch from an explicit cursor). Running an explain plan on the cursor SQL doesn't really show up anything untoward.
However, I found that if I subtly changed the cursor SQL, (so that it did the same thing, but was written differently), it fixed the performance problems.
where ade_start_date between cpDate-cpDays and cpDate-1
/*and ade_start_date < cpDate
and ade_start_date >= (cpDate-cpDays)*/
From this, we thought that there may have been a bad cached execution plan which the change of code forced a recalculation of. However, about 2 hours later, the changed code ran slowly again. So a further subtle change was made, which fixed the issue again. Until this morning, when it was running slowly again.
This feels like it is CBO/stats related potentially, but is out of my area of knowledge unfortunately. We have our DBA investigating this, but there may be things I can test to narrow down the possibilities in the meantime.
We are planning to upgrade our database from Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.1.0 - 64bi to Oracle Standard Edition 11g . We also have oracle apex installed on Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.1.0 - 64bi database with oracle apex 3.1
No our plan to upgrade the database and oracle apex to 4.2. Since Oracle Enterprise Edition is licensing is very expensive we though of buying standard edition and upgrade to this version.
can we upgrade the oracle database from enterprise edition to latest standard edition?
Iam doing some oracle database upgrade from 9.2.0 to 11gr2 . is it possible to upgrade directly from this 9i version to 11gr2 .
Version : 9.2.0 to 11gr2
We had AIX OS on 570 machine and database 10.2.0.4. We took expdp and it took 2 and hour to complete every night.
Now we upgrade to 10.2.0.5 and 770 machine and now same command takes 6 hours to complete even database and hardware is upgraded
Command is
expdp T24SILK/oracle directory=backup dumpfile=exp_beod_T24_%U_$dt
.dmp logfile=exp_T24_$dt.log EXCLUDE=TABLE:"LIKE '%TRACE'" parallel=6
After many tries of upgrade'ing oracle I decided to make backup of my database and then remove 11.2.0.1 and install 11.2.0.3 to recover db. Unfortunately I am not sure how should I perform restoration.I backed up data by calling RMAN> backup database include current controlfile;
After that I moved files from fast_recovery_area and cleared my machine from current oracle release.I also did a copy of directories:
ORACLE_HOMEdbs
ORACLE_HOME
etworkadmin
ORACLE_HOMEowbinadmin
ORACLE_HOMEhostname_dbname
ORACLE_HOMEoc4jj2eeOC4J_DBConsole_hostname_dbname
I'm planning to upgrade a small database (~150GB) from 10.2.0.3 on windows 2003 23bit to 11.2.0.3 RAC on Linux 5.8.The database contains oracle spatial too. A suitable method and link to document to be followed.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI recently performed an upgrade on a new server from oracle 10gr2 to oracle 11gr2 (11.2.0.3).
I take the rman backup from oracle 10g server and restore it on new server where I installed oracle 11gr2.
But on my previous oracle 10gr2 server I enabled the auditing. After doing successful upgrade now when I try to login with any user except sys I receive the following error:
SQL> conn scott/tiger
ERROR:
ORA-00604: error occurred at recursive SQL level 1
ORA-00904: "OBJ$EDITION": invalid identifier
ORA-02002: error while writing to audit trail
ORA-00604: error occurred at recursive SQL level 1
ORA-00904: "OBJ$EDITION": invalid identifier
I got the workaround by setting the parameter audit_trail=FALSE (Previous value was DB_EXTENDED) .But I want my auditing to be enabled as per y requirements.
is the upgrade patch the same for standard edition and enterprise edition or there are two separate patches?
View 5 Replies View RelatedKnow the Patch set number to upgrade a Oracle 10.2.0.1 to 10.2.0.5 on Solaris 10 Spark 64bits?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI am going to upgrade database from 11.1.0.7 to 11.2.0.3
1) If compatible is set to 10.2.0 in 11.2.0.3, will it work ?
2) If compatible set to maximum level, will it affect our application ?
3) Whether any code related problem occurred after upgrading like PL/SQL codes ?
Why COMPATIBLE Parameter is important to be at a certain value before you UPGRADE(10.2.0.4 to 11.2.0.3) to 11g ?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI try to upgrade 11.2.0.2 to 11.2.0.3 on Linux environment. I have to apply patch P1253900 before the upgrade per oracle doc.
however I got following conflict:
Verifying environment and performing prerequisite checks...
Checking skip_duplicate
Checking skip_subset
Conflicts/Supersets for each patch are:
Patch : 12539000
Conflict with 12827726
Conflict details:
/u01/app/grid/product/11.2.0/grid/lib/libserver11.a:/ksxp.o
Following patches have conflicts: [ 12827726 12539000 ] Refer to My Oracle Support Note 1299688.1 for instructions on resolving patch conflicts.
I checked above oracle note, and did not say any resolution.
I am trying to upgrade the database 32bit from 10.2.0.1 to 10.2.0.4 version in lunux 32 bit . I faced the version incompatibilty error during patchset installation and hence ran the patchset installation with -ignoresysprereqs option.Now during the patchset installation i encountered the below error in in the install logfile.
INFO: Start output from spawned process:
INFO: ----------------------------------
INFO:
INFO: /u01/app/oracle/product/10.2.0/bin/genclntsh
INFO: genclntsh: genclntsh: Could not locate /u01/app/oracle/product/10.2.0/network/admin/shrept.lst
[code]....
Need certified os and versions for oracle db 10gr2
I am looking for for exact steps for migration. The important question ist:
-- If we migrate from 10g to 11g, do we need addition (more) CPU's as currently we have?
-- Do wee need more powerful HW.
I am trying to come up with a plan for an upgrade that is needed for a server I maintain. It is a Windows 2003 32bit running Oracle 10.2.0.3 on old Hardware. It also has two obscure 3rd party applications that are running on it that directly access the database. These applications are supported by off site consultants.
My initial plan was to Create a Windows 2008 R2 Virtual Server and install the same version of Oracle 10.2.0.3. Using Rman clone the database to the new server. Have the consultants come in and get the applications working. Once everything in the new environment seems to be working fine, run RMAN again and reclone the database to have all the latest data. Then at a later time upgrade the database to 11g 32bit. Virtually no downtime and we could spend all the time we needed getting the applications working and testing the new environment.
The plan is dead right of the bat though because I realize 10.2.0.3 is not supported by Windows 2008 R2. I really did not want to add an Oracle DB upgrade into the mix at the same time. Just because their are so many changes from the old environment to the new that I want to break this down into manageable chunks. And I can maybe get by with 1 day of down time.
So now I am looking at installing 11g on my Virtual Server, Clone the database, upgrade the database, have the consultants come in and get the applications working. All the while we are down. If we run into any problems, which you always do, it just completely blows the schedule.
I need to upgrade our current system 10.2.0.5 (non Asm) to 11.2.0.3(ASM) on the same host.
So a few options : install ASM on current 10.2.0.5, create volumes etc and shift DB into ASM
upgrade to 11.2.0.3 GI - standalone
upgrade DB to 11.2.0.3
install 11.2.0.3 GI, configure ASM and run against 10.2.0.5
DB upgrade DB to 11.2.0.3
The DB upgrade has to come last I've been told.
i have upgraded the Database from 11.2.0.2 to 11.2.0.3 , after that while i was accessing the D.B i am getting this error.
ORA-00020: maximum number of processes (600) exceeded
after that i have modifed number of process and made it to 1200.
but then i got the same issue
ORA-00020: maximum number of processes (1200) exceeded
is it any Bug or the upgradation went wrong. Is there any change in the primary and foreign keys before and after the upgrade...
i want to know is there any difference between upgradation of SID and database. while upgrading my database from oracle 11.2.0.2 to 11.2.0.3 in DBUA it shows my SID is upgrading (ORCL) but i have few other databases ex (test and prod).
is it enough if we upgrade the SID or we must perform any other actions..
and
2nd QUERY :
i have 2 oracle homes in my server with different versions like (11.2.0.2 and 11.2.0.3)and i have few databases and there tablespaces. how to determine which database is created on which version and which database is upgraded from 11.2.0.2 to 11.2.0.3.
When upgrading database from 10.2.0.1.0 to 10.2.0.4.0 , i am getting following error$
/run Installer Starting Oracle Universal Installer...Checking installer requirements...Checking operating system version: must be redhat-3, SuSE-9, SuSE-10, redhat-4, redhat-5, UnitedLinux-1.0, asianux-1, asianux-2 or asianux-3 Passed All installer requirements met. Preparing to launch Oracle Universal Installer from /tmp/OraInstall2013-09-07_01-25-05AM. Please wait ... error: invalid compressed data to inflate /tmp/OraInstall2013-09-07_01 -25-05AM/oui/jlib/ewt3.jarerror: invalid compressed data to inflate /tmp/OraInstall2013-09-07_01-25-05AM/oui/gui de/htmlguide.jar
Why is knowing the backup policy important before starting any upgrade.
View 17 Replies View RelatedI have an upgrade question. My customer wants to minimize downtime and so wants to do a rolling upgrade of crs, asm, dbhomes and databases from 10.2.0.4 to 10.2.0.5.
Customer wants to upgrade server1 during normal business hours- CRS/ASM/DBHOMES, then move databases from server2 to server1 and upgrade during planned downtime, then upgrade server2 during normal business hours -CRS/ASM/DBHOMES.
3 steps, taking 3 days to complete. Is this possible? I know CRS can be done in a rolling upgrade, but what about ASM?Is this doable?
we have a very critical application running and the backend database is 10.2.0.3. we are planing on upgrading to 10g to 11.2.0.2 and looking ways to look with minimal downtime off production. steps for upgrade with very minimal downtime of appliction?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI tried updating the oracle database from version 11.2.0.1 to 11.2.0.3 but I have no clear procedure. I chose the option of the installer "upgrade database" and install the software on a new home. To migrate, must be all oracle services stopped? In the migration phase, it is normal to ask me listener data, etc .... or installer now detects the same database?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI want to upgrade our database version (9.2.0.7) to 10g (10.2.0.2)
I know if I set COMPATIBLE parameter to 10.2.0.2 at first then I can't downgrade to 9.2.0.7 if any problem occurs I am not sure that our application can deal with 10g or not so I think it's better to leave the COMPATIBLE parameter to 9.2.0 several days for sure and if all things go well then change COMPATIBLE to 10.2.0.2 (I need to say that I can’t test our application in a test environment )
Now do you think leaving COMPATIBLE to 9.2.0 (after upgrade) for many days can cause any problem to Database ?
I am trying to upgrade the database 32bit from 10.2.0.1 to 10.2.0.4 version in Linux 32 bit . I faced the version incompatibility error during patch set installation and hence ran the patchset installation with -ignoresysprereqs option.
Now during the patchset installation i encountered the below error in in the install logfile.
**************************************
INFO: Start output from spawned process:
INFO:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
INFO:
INFO: /u01/app/oracle/product/10.2.0/bin/genclntsh
INFO: genclntsh: genclntsh: Could not locate /u01/app/oracle/product/10.2.0/network/admin/shrept.lst
INFO: make:
INFO: *** [client_sharedlib] Error 1
INFO:
INFO: End output from spawned process.
INFO:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
INFO: Exception thrown from action: make
Exception Name: MakefileException
Exception String: Error in invoking target 'client_sharedlib' of makefile '/u01/app/oracle/product/10.2.0/network/lib/ins_net_client.mk'. See '/u01/app/oracle/oraInventory/logs/installActions2012-06-24_11-45-11AM.log' for details.
Exception Severity: 1
***********************************************
Provide me the certified os and versions for oracle db 10gr2
After upgrading 11gR1 database (11.1.0.7.0) to 11gR2 (11.2.0.3.0), the datapump exports have been taking quite a bit longer. When database was 11gR1, a full expdp took approx. 40-45 minutes. After upgrade, it takes approx. 1 hour 40-50 minutes. These times were with parallel=4. I tried with parallel=8 and parallel=12, both of these took around 1 hour 5-10 minutes, better but still quite a bit slower than pre-11gR2 upgrade. I tried with exclude=statistics, index_statistics, indexes; it still took approx. 1 hour 40-45 minutes. This is a PeopleSoft database so there are many, many objects to be exported. The database was upgraded using dbua.
View 1 Replies View Relatedi want to upgrade my 10g(10.2.0.1.0) 64bit database to 11i. how can perform it. os windows xp.
View 1 Replies View Related