Server Administration :: Unable To Extract Ddl Of Tablespace
Feb 24, 2012
[code]SQL> set heading off
SQL> set pagesize 0
SQL> set long 1000000
SQL> set feedback off
SQL> select
2 dbms_metadata.get_ddl('TABLESPACE','TBLS_DATA')
3 from
4 dual
5 /
ERROR:
ORA-31603: object "TBLS_DATA" of type TABLESPACE not found in schema
"JACK"
ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_SYS_ERROR", line 105
ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_METADATA", line 2806
ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_METADATA", line 4333
ORA-06512: at line 1
When i try to extract ddl of tablespace from a schema JACK, i get error.This tablespace TBLS_DATA does exist in the database.
Upgrading from 10.1.0.2 to 10.1.0.5. Enterprise Manager requires 'newest' version of Oracle JDBC drive.Downloaded what I believe to the correct file (classes12.jar). I'm unclear what to do with this, my readings have pointed me in the following direction:
1) copy to c:oracleproduct10.1.0db_1jre1.4.1in 2) extract
here is the problem...tried:
1) just clicking on it (nothing)
2) c:program filesjavajre1.6.0_03injavaw -jar classes12.jar Error: Failed to load Main-Class manfest atrribute from c:oracleproduct10.1.0db_1jre1.4.1inclasses12.jar
Is my location correct, I've been hunting everywhere..making no progress.
I received Unable to extend the tablespace ORA-01688 error. I checked the free space and found that the free space is available then why tablespace is not able to extend.
select segment_name, partition_name, tablespace_name, round(bytes/1024/1024/1024) gb, extents, max_extents from dba_segments.
1.Is there a chance that a temporary object (table, index, etc) could be created in this tablespace while this process runs and then dropped once it ends. 2.Is this related to max extents that can be allocated say
initial 5M next 5M max 500M and when it reached 500M it is not able to extend and it throws ORA-01688 but the data file space is available.
There was a tablespace of size 100MB.That Tablespace is filled and hence throwing an error like "unable to extent". But verified that there is around 20MB freespace present in the tablespace.what would be the reason behind this error?
When i try to create a duplicate table from an existing table i get error.
SQL> create table COMP_TEMP as select * from COMPETITIVE; create table COMP_TEMP as select * from COMPETITIVE * ERROR at line 1: ORA-01652: unable to extend temp segment by 128 in tablespace DATA_01 The table size is 15 gb.
Currently the tablespace has 2GB free space. If i need to increase the size of the tablespace DATA_01,how much space is required.
I have executed the below statement to move a bulk of table from source table space-SHOP3_DATA to destination tablespace -LINUX_CATA. Before executing the statement the source table space was having 85% full message . While executing the statement this is giving the error for the source tablespace means the the tablespace is getting consumed in the source TS. Currently no-one is using the tablespace SHOP3_DATA' . If I add datafile to the SHOP3_DATA the problem may be solved but why the space is getting consumed in the source. Now the tablespace SHOP3_DATA is 95% full
SQL> alter table LINUX_CATA.TST_FOLDERS move tablespace LINUX_CATA; Table altered. SQL> alter table LINUX_CATA.TST_SEARCH_TESTS move tablespace LINUX_CATA; alter table LINUX_CATA.TST_SEARCH_TESTS move tablespace LINUX_CATA * ERROR at line 1: ORA-01658: unable to create INITIAL extent for segment in tablespace SHOP3_DATA
i have a tablespace which contains 121 datafile(max limit reached) as a dba what we have to do?
creating a new tablespace with a datafile and assign the users to the current tablespace which i created now.iif the above process is correct,after some time the tablespace which was filled up got freed up.now can i give the access to the users previous (i.e. freed up tablespace) and current tablespaces
Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.1.0.7.0 - 64bit Production PL/SQL Release 11.1.0.7.0 - Production CORE 11.1.0.7.0 Production TNS for Linux: Version 11.1.0.7.0 - Production NLSRTL Version 11.1.0.7.0 - Production
My os version is
Linux damdat01 2.6.18-128.7.1.el5 #1 SMP Wed Aug 19 04:00:49 EDT 2009 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
My database is OLP system.
My question is what are the advantages and disadvantages having one single tablespace versus multiple tablespace?
Easy to maintain when you have single tablespace. but hard to track the IO issues if you have one single tablespace.
BANNER -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.3.0 - 64bit Production PL/SQL Release 11.2.0.3.0 - Production CORE 11.2.0.3.0 Production TNS for Solaris: Version 11.2.0.3.0 - Production NLSRTL Version 11.2.0.3.0 - Production
All, I have an infuriating problem and I'm hoping for some advice. Well actually it is a number of problems but I'll use one example as a microcosm.I'm going to use as the example:
Now then, this query runs perfectly and as expected (direct reads/DB scattered reads) until it hit step 13 in the plan (FTS of T6). At step 13 it basically enters into a (rather fatal) process of reading almost nothing but undo exclusively.
Now then, I wonder why this might be. Of course the natural reaction is to say "they data is changing, its read consistency (optional rookie insult)". Now, I found this hard to believe that the volume of data could be so extensively changed, keeping in mind its a good sized table and it's doing a full access.
I checked the DBA_HIST_SEG_STAT(DB_BLOCK_CHANGES_DELTA) view for the period and in the run up, i.e. the explain plan steps 2-12 took approx 20 minutes. In this window, less than 1% of the blocks in the table T6 were changed (approx 3-4k out of a 500k block table).Nearly every access of this table is reading undo, yet since this query started, 99% of the table is unchanged. But the query is behaving as if everything it reads has altered since it began.
To be clear, I understand the read consistency etc and expect it, what I DONT expect is the virtually the ENTIRE table scan operation routing via undo when I'm accessing the full table, yet hardly any blocks are altered after I start running.
Note this query/application seems to fetch the rows in blocks of 1k, its almost as if its re-executing for each fetch, but I wouldn't have expected that.
In summary: >Query starts >hits final table >almost exclusive undo reads >under 1% of block changes in read table since query began
Is there any other way anyone knows of that might cause a session to read into undo beyond a session changing data after the query executed?
I have one database which is recently upgraded from oracle 8.1.5 to oracle 10.2.0.4.The database is having around 300 tablespace and total size of the database is 1.5 TB.
The database was created in oracle 8i and all the teblespace were DMT(Dictionary Managed Tablespace) .Usually after up gradation all the tablespace are in DMT mode. Now my requirement is to convert all the tablespace into LMT (Locally Managed Tablespace) so that I can AVAIL ALL THE FEATURES OF LMT.
This database is a mission critical database and very less downtime can be allowed.
while importing data i got this error in my log file.and i cannot import my data successfuly
in my log file error i found like this
ORA-01658: unable to create INITIAL extent for segment in tablespace USERS IMP-00017: following statement failed with ORACLE error 1658: IMP-00003: ORACLE error 1658 encountered ORA-01658: unable to create INITIAL extent for segment in tablespace USERS IMP-00017: following statement failed with ORACLE error 1658:
i can import my data using imp utility using this syntax
C:UsersAdministrator>imp tiger/****@tcs file=E:DUMP s. dmp log=E:DUMP s.log fromuser=tiger121 touser=tiger statistics=none
this my user tiger default tablespace its uses and its a auto extend on and locally managed tablespace,and i have enough space on my drive also.
Am trying to extract data from oracle onto flatfile(.txt), am using UTL_FILE but, NULLs in oracle tables are getting converted into space and if i try loading into table it is getting loaded as space,
Problem Description: There are five range partitioned tables which are partitioned by date,designed by previous DBA.Four tables are in one tablespace and one more table is in another tablespace.For every three months there are two tablespaces are created autamatically in new names for future dates.There is no scheduled job for this.How they are created?.This is our question.
In my database ,the size of the system tablespace is 1024M.now i found its free space is 477.875M.
SQL> SELECT TABLESPACE_NAME,SUM(BYTES)/1024/1024 M FROM DBA_FREE_SPACE where tablespace_name = 'SYSTEM' GROUP BY TABLESPACE_NAME ; TABLESPACE_NAME M --------------- ------- SYSTEM 477.875
In system tablespace ,the max size segment is IDL_UB1$,it is 167M
SQL> SELECT SEGMENT_NAME, SX || 'M' "Size" FROM (SELECT SEGMENT_NAME,SUM(BYTES)/1024/1024 SX FROM DBA_SEGMENTS WHERE TABLESPACE_NAME = 'SYSTEM' GROUP BY SEGMENT_NAME) WHERE SX > 100 ORDER BY SX DESC; SEGMENT_NAME Size ------------- ----- IDL_UB1$ 167M
My tablespace contains two datafiles dfile1.dbf and dfile2.dbf on D drive of my filesystem. Now i copied these dbf files on pasted it on a location in E drive. Now i want my tablespace to use dbf files pasted in new location.
Will i have to Alter Tablespace Add Datafile with Reuse clause
In My database rollback segment space is not releasing space even though, there is no transaction is using RBS. RBS tablespace size is around 70GB. Unfortunately still our environment is running in 9i due to application code
SQL> show parameter undo
NAME TYPE VALUE ------------------------------------ ----------- ------------------------------ undo_management string MANUAL undo_retention integer 1800 undo_suppress_errors boolean FALSE undo_tablespace
Erroneously created datafile, re: "/path/../large_rbs_03.dbf" was created under the SYSTEM tablespace which is supposedly be in the LARGE_RBS tablespace.
How do I make the said datafile be under LARGE_RBS?
As the undo segments are used in round robin fashion, Is it possible that with varying load (concurrent users, size and number of transactions), the size of Undo tablespace on a particular day is less than the Undo tablespace size few days back, by any chance?
As a basic understanding I know that Undo is preserved for read consistency and transaction, instance recovery So if there are lot of transaction on a database on 05 Feb and before that, but there aren't any transactions on 6,7,8,9, then on 10th Feb can we see the Undo tablespace size is less than that of 05 Feb?
In the following case when data belonging to table is not required for any queries, transactions, even then the undo size is not restored upon dropping the table.
As such for large operations and batch processes shall we keep undo tablespace with files as 'Autoextend' with 'Maxsize' as 'Unlimited'?
I want to increase the size of the tablespace but when i login as sysdba or admin user i can just see the 21 tables in the dba_tablespaces or user_tablespaces. I want to see the tablespaces related to the application.
Due to improper documentations of a certain project, I need to drop a DEFAULT tablespace of a newly created instance including it's associated datafiles by using this command:
"DROP TABLESPACE <tablespace name> INCLUDING CONTENTS AND DATAFILES;"
The default tablespace name is QWER (qwer01.dbf) and I added 2 datafiles in it, re: OPD_SML01.dbf & EXYT_SML01.dbf.
