Replication :: Refresh Snapshot Data Without Logging
Jan 20, 2009
Materialized views are normally used for summarized data access.
CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW mv_snapshot_A
REFRESH FAST START WITH SYSDATE
NEXT SYSDATE + 20/1440
WITH PRIMARY KEY
AS SELECT * FROM A;
This does not seem to be the case here as the materialized view seems to be just a full select. The overhead of the snapshot logs are concerning for this core table. Can we turn off logging in 10g ? the materialized view is defined as fast refresh/ build immediate .
The main requirement here is to keep the snapshot every 15 minutes so that the users can see the updated information ( the flow of data from one location to other).
User get the location wise count of data and can go further in details like in which location wise system wise data count. As the base table is volatile the materialized view is used so that the moment the user clicks for location wise details the data is static for 15 min and user don't get confused.
View 31 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Mar 24, 2010
How to refresh the dependent materialized views in a snapshot group. It refreshes in the order we add the materialized views to snapshot group?
Here below is the scenario.
MATVW_A
CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW MATVW_A BUILD IMMEDIATE
REFRESH FAST ON COMMIT
AS SELECT * FROM EMP;
MATVW_B
CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW MATVW_B BUILD IMMEDIATE
REFRESH FAST ON COMMIT
AS SELECT * FROM MATVW_A;
MATVW_C
CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW MATVW_C BUILD IMMEDIATE
REFRESH FAST ON COMMIT
AS SELECT * FROM MATVW_B;
I created a snapshotgroup SNGRP with all the above materialized views.
DBMS_REFRESH.MAKE(name => 'SNGRP',
tab => 'MATVW_A,MATVW_B,MATVW_C',
next_date => TRUNC(sysdate) + 1,
interval => 'SYSDATE + 1');
The order of refreshing the materialized views would be like first materialized view MATVW_A should get refresh then after MATVW_B,MATVW_C.
As they are dependent views.Is there anyway where we can mention the order of refreshing materialized views in snapshot group.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Nov 4, 2012
I have 3 reporting tables with 2.2 million records each being rebuilt nightly. The data is used online 24/7 by users and thus, snapshot tables are being built from the refreshed reporting tables. The current method to do this:
delete from snapshot table;
insert into snapshot table (select * from report table);
<repeat for other 2 tables>
commit;
This seems to me to be resource intense on the system even though the table is defined with nologging option.
Is it better to create a MV (select only with refresh complete on demand)? The query is very simple without joins so it at first seems like overkill. However, I am also seeing that dbms_mview.refresh allows for an atomic option. Thus, if 1 of the 3 MVs fails during refresh all 3 rollback, which is a nice feature.
Are there better ways to replicate a snapshot table that I've missed? Is a delete and insert strategy a bad idea?
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 4, 2011
Some materialized views get status broken on refreshment, but only sometime. When I try to refresh them manually I get following message:
"ORA-01400: cannot insert NULL into...".
But I know for sure that there are no NULL values in the master table, MV and master tables are declared in the same way and all columns in master tables are NOT NULL columns. Another ting is that this error I get only on columns with data type CLOB.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 14, 2010
I am getting ORA -32320 when I tried to fast fresh MVs that were truncated.I am able to complete refresh all MVs. However, some MVs are still giving me ORA-32320 when I try to do fast refresh even after complete refresh.
DBMS_MVIEW.EXPLAIN_PLAN says the MVIEW can be fast refreshed.
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-32320: REFRESH FAST of "dev"."Claim_line" unsupported after cointainer table
PMOPs
ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_SNAPSHOT", line 803
ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_SNAPSHOT", line 860
ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_SNAPSHOT", line 841
ORA-06512: at line 1
Quote:ORA-32320:
REFRESH FAST of "string"."string" unsupported after container table PMOPs Cause: A Partition Maintenance Operation (PMOP) has been performed on the materialized view, and no materialized view supports fast refersh after container table PMOPs. Action: Use REFRESH COMPLETE. Note: you can determine why your materialized view does not support fast refresh after PMOPs using the DBMS_MVIEW.EXPLAIN_MVIEW() API.
how to again make the MVs fast refreshable?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Feb 2, 2008
Can i create an index on a snapshot... to increase the performance of searching.... in Oracle 8i.... provide with syntax...
Or else tell me how to increase the speed of a query on Snapshot.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 7, 2008
what is the difference between materialized view and snapshot ?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 21, 2009
I am having problems with my procedure which is refreshing materialized views. This is the error i am getting : -12008: ORA-12008: error in materialized view refresh path
ORA-01555: snapshot too old: rollback segment number 14...
I have two database with the same procedure and the same objects. They run at the same time, however, there are times when i get the error on the other database while the other database runs the procedure without any error.
When i checked the net, they say that this error is caused by data that is old, so the solution is to make the source a predecessor of my procedure/job. But what i am thinking is that how was it possible for the other database to run it completely even if it is not yet linked as the successor of the source?
View 8 Replies
View Related
Jan 28, 2010
During the MV refresh we are getting the following error and not able to fix it .
SQL> EXECUTE DBMS_MVIEW.REFRESH('EMP','F');
BEGIN DBMS_MVIEW.REFRESH('EMP','F'); END;
*
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-12008: error in materialized view refresh path
ORA-01400: cannot insert NULL into ("XYZ"."EMP"."DESCRIPTION")
ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_SNAPSHOT", line 2251
ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_SNAPSHOT", line 2457
ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_SNAPSHOT", line 2426
ORA-06512: at line 1
The above column:- Emp.Description is a 'CLOB NOT NULL' .
We have created the MV using the below script
create materialized view EMP refresh on demand for update as select *from ABC.EMP@DBLINK;
View 2 Replies
View Related
Sep 12, 2008
I have attempted to set up the materialized view below to refresh complete at the time specified below. The problem is that it does not refresh and pick up the changes to one of the base tables.
When I issue the command:
exec DBMS_REFRESH.REFRESH('TEAMSITE3.FIRMSEARCH_COWS_MV ');
the refresh works..
why this view is not refreshing at the time stated??
CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW FIRMSEARCH_COWS_MV
REFRESH COMPLETE START WITH to_date('11-09-2008 10:00:00','dd-MM-yyyy hh24:mi:ss') NEXT (SYSDATE+1)
AS SELECT distinct spar.COW_REF
FROM LV_RECOGNISED_ATTAINMENTS lra,
LV_POSITION_IN_ORGANISATIONS rio,
[code]....
View 15 Replies
View Related
Nov 22, 2007
Have some issue with Materialized view refresh. Have presented scenario which we have .
Schema1 :
1. Have base tables
2. Created MV logs on base tables
Schema2 :
1. Created sysnonyms for Schema1 base tables
2. created Materialized views
3. Created MV group , added views to the group
Executing the below command in schema2 :
execute dbms_refresh.refresh('MV_grp');
Error :
ORA-12048: error encountered while refreshing materialized view
"Schema2"."Table1_MV"
ORA-12018: following error encountered during code generation for
"Schema2"."Table1_MV
"ORA-00942: table or view does not exist
ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_SNAPSHOT", line 2255
ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_SNAPSHOT", line 2461
ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_IREFRESH", line 683
ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_REFRESH", line 195
ORA-06512: at line 1
View 5 Replies
View Related
Oct 29, 2008
I am using basic replication in oracle 10.2.0.3. My materialized view object contains around 3 million records. Usually we are using FAST refresh but in my materialized view having some problem that’s the reason I am going to Complete refresh.
If I start complete refresh it will take 8-12 hours to complete refresh.
My Question is: During Complete refresh how to monitor complete refresh running or not except using
v$mvrefresh.
Is there any way to monitor complete refresh because suppose target database not available/network problem/ dead lock occur in my database. I can’t able to track refresh.
Even there is no notification in alert log.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Dec 22, 2005
How can i use refresh option as 1 hr in creation of materialized view, Can i use unoin all in the materialized view and other clause like CONNECT BY PRIOR .
View 22 Replies
View Related
Jun 19, 2008
CREATE Materialized View log on t1 with rowid;
CREATE Materialized View log on t2 with rowid;
CREATE Materialized View log on t3 with rowid;
CREATE Materialized View MV_test
BUILD IMMEDIATE
FAST REFRESH ON COMMIT
[code].......
I have created a Materialized View by joining the above 3 tables. The Materialized View logs with ROWID has been created on each of the 3 base tables. One of the base tables has around 160 million rows and i expect the Materialized View to have the same number of rows.
The Materialized View has been built for FAST REFRESH on COMMIT. The SELECT list of the CREATE Materialized View statement includes all the ROWIDS from each base tables for doing the fast refresh.
The DBMS_MVIEW explain view shows that the view is capable of doing fast refresh on any DML. The Materialized View took 3 hrs to get built. I have also created indexes on all the three rowid columns (t1rowid,t2rowid,t3rowid) on the Materialized View.
Now, When i do any update on one of the base table and do a commit,
UPDATE t1 set value=500 where tx_id='1234';
The commit is taking around around 15 minutes. I have generated the trace and had a look at it, and it shows that, to refresh the Materialized View, ORACLE is first deleting that record from the Materialized View and then inserting the new record from the base table to the Materialized View.
This delete done by oracle is being done on the basis of the rowid of the updated record stored on the Materialized View log,
However its not using the index created on the t1rowid of the Materialized View and doing a full scan of the MV and hence the delete is taking a lot of time. The delete statement is using a hint NO_MERGE and HASH_SJ which is causing it to do the full table scan of the MV. why is ORACLE not using the index on the t1rowid column of the MV to do this delete?
Also to do the insert in the MV, its selecting the new changed value from the base tables t1,t2 and t2. Here again its doing a full table scan of the base table t1, rather then using the rowid directly or the index coulmn.which is taking a lot of time.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Apr 28, 2009
However, I need to refresh the group manually sometimes. Therefore, I cannot set the interval as sysdate+1.have tried setting the interval as follows. However, they are not correct
Quote:trunc(sysdate+1) +4/24
The next interval will show 9:25:20pm.
Quote:trunc(sysdate+1) + interval '4' hour
Incorrect syntax
View 7 Replies
View Related
Apr 17, 2008
I created materialized view in Database B. The master table is in Database A. If i shutdown the database B and bring it up again, the next refresh time in dba_jobs tablein database A is coming as 01-jan-00. It is not getting refreshed automatically. The job_queue_process is 10. wat could be the reason, for the refresh failure.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jul 25, 2008
How to reset the status of Refresh Group?
In our database, it is showing the status of Refresh group to 'Broken'.
View 6 Replies
View Related
Jan 6, 2010
I am working on materialized view replication but i have an crucial issue. I have a refresh group which contain many MVs some are Read only and some are update but all are in Fast refresh mode (logs are created on both replication and MV sites on these objects) and are referentially integrated to each other i.e they have parent child relationship with each other as at replication site on base tables.
When refresh group job runs to refresh these MVs i got the errors
ORA-02292: integrity constraint (string.string) violated - child record found
After that job status has changed to break,but in the same time all the pending transactions at the MVs sites are pushed to Replication site i e ( Base tables at replication site and MVs of these tables are synchronized).In order to change the status of job to Normal, i have to disable some constraints(not all) on the MVs and manually run the job .After that job status will become Normal even i enable these constraints with validation.
What will be the reason ? Are there some MVs trying to complete refresh instead of Fast or increment refresh in this refresh group?If yes how i can trace out MVs and solve this problem?
Some other information ,
Replication site running with 10gR2 Enterprise Edition.
Materialized View site running with 10gR2 Slandered Edition.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 28, 2010
hw can i check the refresh rate of existing Mview..
View 4 Replies
View Related
Apr 22, 2009
I have a refresh group that will refresh several materialized views at 4:00am. Sometimes the job failed. We need to enter to the enterprise manager to check the status of the refresh group.
Our target is that notification email is sent to our email once the refresh job failed. I have found some software that can do that. However, we need to handle ourselves. I would like to ask whether we can do that using enterprise manager.
View 7 Replies
View Related
Jul 7, 2010
Create Materialized view with Refresh on commit example. with create Log file example.
View 6 Replies
View Related
Aug 19, 2009
TABLE NAME :ABC
(PARTITION BASE TABLE - 84 Partition and each Partition has 500-800 Millions of Records)
/* Step1 Create MATERIALIZED VIEW LOG */
CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW LOG ON ABC;
/* Step2 Create MATERIALIZED VIEW Refresh after Every 20 Minutes */
CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW MV_ABC
REFRESH FAST
START WITH SYSDATE
NEXT SYSDATE+20/ (24*60) AS
SELECT * FROM ABC
WHERE TMSTP > SYSDATE-1;
Scenario:Intially data extracted will be "Greater than SYSDATE-1 = 18/08/2009 11:27:39 " - 76 Millions of Records After 20 Min of FAST Refresh, it will add 2500 Records
i)Is query in the MVIEWS (MV_ABC) SYSDATE-1 will be changed on each FAST Refresh, as observation (as per definition) it is incrementing the records to intial extracted data?
ii)As COMPLETE Refresh will be expensive to execute on the partition base table on each refresh.
Is there any alternative way to achieve the Nature of COMPLETE REFRESH in Materialized View?
iii)Is Delete or Conditional Delete option is possible in Materialized View (i.e not a delete from the base table but the delete from MVIEWS)?
iv)What is the machnism for populating the logs for MVIEWS?Is it overhead for the system and better than a Trigger based approach?
View 11 Replies
View Related
Mar 25, 2009
Suppose I have materialized view A,B,C. Now I have a new materialized view D which is created from A,B,C. Can I put D into same refresh group?
I am not sure whether D will be refreshed first before A,B,C, resulting that D do not get any update If that is the case, the result will be wrong
If we cannot use refresh group to update nested materialized view, what should we do?
View 13 Replies
View Related
May 5, 2010
how to check the time taken for materialized view to execute at one time.
My materialized view is a complete refresh which automatically executes at 3:00.
a) I have queried dba_jobs and dba_mview_refresh_times, and matched the last_date and last_refresh to find the total time. How can I be know that JOB 80 corresponds to my view MVIEW_UNION in a much easier way?
SQL> select job,last_date,total_time from dba_jobs order by last_date;
JOB LAST_DATE TOTAL_TIME
---------- ----------------- ----------
80 05/05/10 03:00:02 5255
SQL>select name,last_refresh from dba_mview_refresh_times where owner
NAME LAST_REFRESH
------------------------------ -----------------
MVIEW_UNION 05/05/10 03:00:02
b) Also is total_time the time it took the query to execute today at 3:00, i.e it started at 3:00 and ended at around 4:45(3+5255 msec) or is it the overall time it has taken since the day it was scheduled in dba_jobs( i.e 1 week back)
c) Also my source table dosent contain any indexes and I have created indexes on materialized view, i want to know if the complete refresh will recreate the indxes.
View 9 Replies
View Related
Sep 4, 2008
We are facing serious problem while refreshing materialized views using fast refresh option in ORACLE..For the very first time we are performing Complete refresh of data from DB1 to DB2 for few tables.Ongoing we are performing Fast Refresh.Sometimes the fast refresh works fine without any error and sometimes it fails with the below error.
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-32320: REFRESH FAST of "CIR"."C_BO_COMM" unsupported after
cointainer table
PMOPs
ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_SNAPSHOT", line 803
ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_SNAPSHOT", line 860
ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_SNAPSHOT", line 841
ORA-06512: at line 1
let me know when will this error occur during Fast Refresh.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Aug 20, 2009
CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW LOG ON ABC;
CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW MV_ABC
REFRESH FAST
START WITH SYSDATE
NEXT SYSDATE+20/(24*60)
FOR UPDATE
AS
SELECT * FROM ABC WHERE TMSTP> SYSDATE-1;
It is working fine. Appended the Query with WHERE clause in MV_ABC MVIEWS.
DROP MATERIALIZED VIEW LOG ON ABC;
DROP MATERIALIZED VIEW MV_ABC;
CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW LOG ON ABC;
CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW MV_ABC
REFRESH FAST
START WITH SYSDATE
NEXT SYSDATE+20/(24*60)
FOR UPDATE
AS
SELECT * FROM ABC WHERE TMSTP> SYSDATE-1;
ORA-12013: updatable materialized VIEWS must be simple enough TO DO fast refresh
View 6 Replies
View Related
Jul 31, 2013
. I need to configure simple standby database. I have followed this[URL]...-guard-setup-11gr2.php tutorial to do that Problem is that primary db cannot log on to the standby db. Informations privided below
:Primary DB:CentOS 6.4Oracle 11gR2ORACLE_SID=primdb1SQL> SELECT MESSAGE FROM V$DATAGUARD_STATUS; MESSAGE--------------------------------------------------------------------------------ARC0: Archival startedARC1: Archival startedARC2: Archival startedARC1: Becoming the 'no FAL' ARCHARC1: Becoming the 'no SRL' ARCHARC2: Becoming the heartbeat ARCHARC1: Beginning to archive thread 1 sequence 31 (336165-356856)Error 12514 received logging on to the standbyPING[ARC2]: Heartbeat failed to connect to standby 'stbydb1'. Error is 12514.ARC1: Completed archiving thread 1 sequence 31 (336165-
[code]....
View 21 Replies
View Related
Dec 16, 2012
(Oracle 11gR1 OEL 5)Is there any possibility to convert snapshot database (standby) directly to Primary. Instead of manual switchover I want to do this
I have checked that snapshot creates a guaranteed restoration point which reverts back changes in Standby.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Aug 30, 2013
If flashback is enable in physical standby database 1. If we failover at 11AM can I flash back NEW primary database to 6 AM ? 2. if I convert physically standby database to snapshot standby database at 11AM , Can I flashback snapshot standby database to 6 AM and do some works on it (DML operations) then converting the snapshot standby database into physical standby database ?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 19, 2012
The developer team wants to test their application. For the same they need some data which resides at oracle 8i instance. However they are not able to create a dblink between 11g and 8i as this is not supported by oracle.
Now they want the data to be refreshed from 8i to 11g by exp/imp.
Apart from exp and imp is there is any other alternatives?
View 2 Replies
View Related
