after running some TPC-C performance benchmarks on oracle 11g/r2 the following results for average transaction time vs user load were found:
Userload 1 : 60ms
Userload 2 : 55ms
Userload 3 : 25ms
Userload 4 : 25ms
Surely these should be the other way wound, transaction time increasing as the number of users does?
what may have caused this? or are the user loads too small to be representative
I have an application connected to Oracle 11g that sends its own querys to the db based on what the user is clickng on. The applicaiton is connected via one user id and I was wondering, is there a way that I can capture the tiem each query starts, the sql itself, and the amount of time it took to fetch the data?
View 7 Replies View RelatedI've got a query running a select count (*) over a table. The default plan takes in the order of 15 minutes to return, a hinted plan to use a different index takes 3 minutes to return.
Unfortunately I cant get at the index stats and a few other areas which I suspect may be key here.When running autotrace against the two queries I see fairly different values as one would expect.
Query
select count (*) from fulfilmentitem bfi where created >= sysdate-30 AND bfi.status = 'FA' AND bfi.fulfilmentmethod = 'D'
Slow run
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)|
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 1 | 15 | 33119 (1)|
| 1 | SORT AGGREGATE | | 1 | 15 | |
|* 2 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| FULFILMENTITEM | 12525 | 183K| 33119 (1)|
|* 3 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | IDX_FULFIL_METHODSTATUS | 250K| | 1786 (1)|
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[code]....
IDX_FULFIL_METHODSTATUS is across FULFILMENTMETHOD & STATUS in that order.
IDX_BFI_CREATED is on CREATED and is approx 70% of the size of the other index
The row counts estimated in the explain plan are out, the count(*) comes in at 32.8k rows.As you will have seen, the fast run shows a pretty significant consistent get increase compared to the slow run and a decent though not dramatic physical read drop.
My uncertainty is around if these changes in consistent get/phys read values would typically be enough to suggest the real time improvements I'm observing or if other (albeit perhaps temporary) factors are involved. It is a prod OLTP environment so the data will be rapidly changing and that may be a factor.
I know it can never be an exact science without intimately knowing the hardware/current loads etc but I also know that there's enough experience on these boards to have a loose handle on if the time shifts between queries are likely (or not) to be reflective of the stat changes or if those differences alone shouldn't (or typically wouldn't account) for it.
I'm thinking about instructing the query to ignore its original plan but am hesitant to do so without being a little more confident that it's not just a timing thing or something other than the change of index approach which may be causing the improvement. the autotrace stat changes observed I couldn't put my hand on heart say "yup - that change is good, ignore the default index all the time for this job".
what the principal things to look at when we have for the same query different performance results are?I have 2 different bases: the plan and data are the same but performance results are very differents.
View 10 Replies View Relatedi have to grant permission to a user on a package dbms_transaction.After i granted permission i am getting error:
ORA-01031: insufficient privileges
ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_TRANSACTION", line 88
ORA-06512: at line 1
I have a long running transaction (more than 3 hours), and at the same time other operations are occurring on different tables, using the same UNDO space.
Sometimes we see ORA-30036, but this error occurs very late in the process. The transaction normally takes 3 hours, but when UNDO space is full, we do not get ORA-30036 upto 8 hours or 9 hours of process.
I am wondering what could be happening in the background, when UNDO space is full, which makes the transaction to extend upto 8 hours or 9 hours (pl. note, this transaction gets completed within 3 hours normally). This is in 11g, UNDO space is managed manually.
We are copying our transaction tables data into another database for our reporting applications (say every day midnight refresh will happen).
The Transaction Database has some 30tables. Existing system is following below points and it is taking 2hours to complete.
1) Truncate data from reporting database (or schema)
2) Direct path Insert into reporting database (or schema) as select * from transaction tables.
3) Rebuild index and Enable constraints.
Note: Each tables data will vary from 30lakhs to 50lakhs. Dump/import/export is not advised by the client.
I want to cut down the time i.e., below 2hours. Instead of above method. Can go for a field in each table specifying the time of each records update/insert operation and then pick the modified records only and copy into reporting db.
Some of my forms taking to much time while loading on some machines but same forms working fine on other machines with same configuration.
Forms, version: 10.1.2.0.2, Clients: Win_XP_Pro, App Server: Window 2003 Server, IE7, Jinit 1.3.1.26
how can we load a Flat file into a Database At Regular Interval Time.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have a OWB mapping which takes input from a staging table and add those row to the Cube. The underlying table behind cube is a relational fact table joined with the dimensions using foreign keys. Explain plan behind the query has a rather high cost and the mapping runs for 30 minutes. If you see below, in step 17, the cost goes up to 1,396,573 which is also where nested loops start to appear. Query plan is also attached in the image format.
Plan
SELECT STATEMENT ALL_ROWSCost: 1,746,526,275 Bytes: 386,835,904 Cardinality: 464,947
46 NESTED LOOPS OUTER Cost: 1,746,526,275 Bytes: 386,835,904 Cardinality: 464,947
41 NESTED LOOPS OUTER Cost: 1,744,200,663 Bytes: 380,791,593 Cardinality: 464,947
37 NESTED LOOPS OUTER Cost: 1,743,270,415 Bytes: 374,747,282 Cardinality: 464,947
34 NESTED LOOPS OUTER Cost: 1,740,476,128 Bytes: 368,702,971 Cardinality: 464,947
29 NESTED LOOPS OUTER Cost: 1,739,545,862 Bytes: 362,658,660 Cardinality: 464,947
25 NESTED LOOPS OUTER Cost: 1,710,193,475 Bytes: 356,614,349 Cardinality: 464,947
[code].........
I have a big table in which we load about 37M recrods. We have informatica ETL which Loads the data in bulk Mode and creats index after completion. The data load takes about 1Hr and Index Creation takes about 1/2 hr. In total it takes about 90 to 95 Mnts.
Now I thought if Partition and Load paralley, It will improve perfromance. We did 4 partition and and each Partition about 9M records. The data load in Bulk mode is completing in 25 Mnts. Again When I am creating index over it, It is taking about 40 Mnts. and in Total Load time is 65 Mnts.
Is there way I can better performance to complete the load in 1/2 hr ?
which tools are available for monitoring load of the database?
View 4 Replies View Relatedwhat i miss to load date and time from text file to oracle table through sqlloader
this is my data in this path (c:externalmy_data.txt)
7369,SMITH,17-NOV-81,09:14:04,CLERK,20
7499,ALLEN,01-MAY-81,17:06:08,SALESMAN,30
7521,WARD,09-JUN-81,17:06:30,SALESMAN,30
7566,JONES,02-APR-81,09:24:10,MANAGER,20
7654,MARTIN,28-SEP-81,17:24:10,SALESMAN,30
my table in database emp2
create table emp2 (empno number,
ename varchar2(20),
hiredate date,
etime date,
ejob varchar2(20),
deptno number);
the control file code in this path (c:externalctrl.ctl)
load data
infile 'C:externalmy_data.txt'
into table emp2
fields terminated by ','
(empno, ename, hiredate, etime, ejob, deptno)
this is the error :
C:>sqlldr scott/tiger control=C:externalctrl.ctl
SQL*Loader: Release 10.2.0.1.0 - Production on Mon May 31 09:45:10 2010
Copyright (c) 1982, 2005, Oracle. All rights reserved.
Commit point reached - logical record count 5
C:>
I need to create a script which can fetch the error related details from Trace files regularly (may be twice a day ) to a custom table in DB.
View 3 Replies View Relatedin one short i want to drop more than one user?
View 6 Replies View Relatedis there any syntax to drop all the tables at a time in a user
View 12 Replies View RelatedI've plan to use "CPU Time Per User Call" metrics.
The thresholds are:
Warning: 8000
Critical: 10000
But this alarm raise every minute.
I think it's too low.But which is the correct value to identify performance problems?
How we know a user account locked time in HH:MM:SS format ?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI'm new to the sqlplus,
User ID Failed_timestamp
----------------------------------
userA 20100801 11:22:33
userB 20100802 11:22:33
userA 20100802 12:22:44
userA 20100803 13:34:55
userC 20100803 20:21:23
userB 20100804 16:34:56
I wanna to get the last failed time from each user. what is the select statement?
my expected result will be:
userA 20100803 13:34:55
userB 20100804 16:34:56
userC 20100803 20:21:23
i would like provide a captcha at the time of password recovey to the user. is it possible to place a captcha in forms 6i. if possible how to provide it. i want the piece of code.
View 5 Replies View RelatedI have one query in my production which is taking more CPU time. when that statement executing the CUP is taking more than 90%
I am attaching the sql query and indexes on the table.
update xml eating up a lot of time is there any way to tune
SELECT UPDATEXML(:B3 , '/FCUBS_RES_ENV/FCUBS_BODY/FLD/FN[@TYPE="' || :B2 ||
'"]', :B1 )
FROM
DUAL
call count cpu elapsed disk query current rows
------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
Parse 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
Execute 499 0.44 0.90 0 3 0 0
Fetch 499 1.49 2.87 0 0 0 499
------- ------ -------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
total 999 1.93 3.77 0 3 0 499
real code
SELECT updatexml(l_xml,
'/FCUBS_RES_ENV/FCUBS_BODY/FLD/FN[@TYPE="' ||
upper(replace(cspkes_misc.fn_getparam(p_parent_list,
l_parent_list_clob,
'Y',
l_cnt,
'>'),
'-',
'_')) || '"]/text()',
l_fn_str)
INTO l_xml
FROM dual;
How can i check the avg time taken by an execution plan. Actually i have a very big query and it changes its execution plan very often, we would like to lock the best execution plan and to find it , i would like to know the Average Execution Time the query takes when it runs using different different execution plans.
View 7 Replies View RelatedTill statspack we had
elapsed time = time spent on waits + time CPU was used
Total time during snaps = Elapsed time + (may be) time waited for CPU...In AWR is it possible to draw such equation? I can see that the AWR report has following elements
1) End Snap time - Begin Snap time
2) DB time - as mentioned at the top of AWR report
3) DB CPU - in "Top 5 Timed Foreground Events" (I assume this is 'CPU used by sesson timing' in statspack)
4) Total of time for all Statistics in "Time Model Statistics"
5) BUSY_TIME + IDLE_TIME - "Operating System Statistics"
Time between 2 snapshots? or what else? Also for which seconds to multiply to 'DB Time(s)' per second and 'DB CPU(s)' per second in Load Profile to get the db time and CPU time?
For example, we have a table ACCOUNT (snowflake dimension containing other dimension keys) and I have many fact tables based on this dimension. Normally data warehouse load happens like first dimensions needs to be loaded and then facts. Our frequency of loads is 30 mins.
To increase the rate in which the data will be available in the facts (as its a financial application), am considering to have two batches one with dimension and another one with fact (came to this conclusion as there is no dependency like first dimensions to be loaded then only fact) just the update might get missed sometimes. But if I do that, when dimension gets loaded, it will be read in the facts in another session. Will this affect the performance ?
LOADING (insert/update) and selecting data from table at the same time. Will it affect the performance in any way.
I understand that when data is read from the disk, I/O is done..And When computations are done then CPU is used..Then where the following equation fits?
DB Time = sum of database CPU time + waits
Is I/O considered as a part of CPU time?
Does this equation changes with SAN, OS caching?
Elapsed Time (s)CPU Time (s)Executions Elap per Exec (s) % Total DB TimeSQL IdSQL ModuleSQL Text
3,263 32 1 3263.49 2.79 3ta0ms19fvgds httpd.exe SELECT CASE WHEN COUNT >= 1...Elapsed
6,360 164 2 3180.17 5.44 51jx99dm0swv7 cpm_srvscript@ahcaxasmil1b (TNS V1-V3) SELECT /*+ CCL<PFT_GET_RP...
On AWR, I see two script that are out of ordinary, and I want to make sure that I interpret them correctly.
1) "Elap per Exec (s)" shows 3263.49 with 1 "Executions".
2) "Elap per Exec (s)" shows 3180.17 each execution with 2 "Executions".
Does this mean that this script ran for ~ 54 minutes (3263.49 / 60 seconds) for 1 "Execution" and ~ 53 minutes (3180.17 / 60 seconds) per each execution? I need to understand "Elapsed Time (s),CPU Time (s),Executions ,Elap per Exec (s), % Total DB Time" represent.
I have a table which contains 8,21,177 amount of data totally.Now I am trying to delete around 4,84,000 of data from this table by using just one filter i.e. my query is something like below
DELETE /*+ parallel(resource,4) */ FROM resource where created_by = 'MIGN'
This is going to delete 4,84,000 rows of data . But my current issue is this is taking lots of time to delete the data . To be precise , its almost taking 25 hours to delete this data..The created_by column is indexed .
Execution Plan
----------------------------------------------------------
Plan hash value: 2389236532
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 0 | DELETE STATEMENT | | 499 | 20459 | 39 (0)| 00:00:
01 |
| 1 | DELETE | RESOURCE | | | |
[code]....
The problem was describe:
- First time to execute: Using all indexes on 2 tables
- Second time to execute: Using only indexes on first table, full table scan on the other
- Third time to execute: Do FTS on both of tables.
Now, I show the objects and relate information here:
The Tables:
system@dbwap> select count(*) from my_wap.news_relation;
COUNT(*)
----------
272708
system@dbwap> select count(*) from my_wap.news_content;
COUNT(*)
----------
95092
system@dbwap> desc my_wap.news_content;
Name Null? Type
----------------------------------------------------- -------- ----------------
ID NOT NULL NUMBER(11)
SUBJECT NOT NULL VARCHAR2(500)
TITLE VARCHAR2(4000)
STATE NUMBER(1)
IMGPATH VARCHAR2(500)
ALIGN VARCHAR2(10)
[Code]....
Test1 table have around 385772300 rows. below delete and select statment talking lot of time.
Select stament taking more than 1 hrs.
SELECT TO_NUMBER(MAX(f.T3))
--INTO v_FISCAL_MONTH_ID
FROM Test1 f;
delete statment taking more than 2 hours
DELETE FROM TEST1 WHERE TRUNC(T10) < TRUNC(ADD_MONTHS(SYSDATE,-36));
CREATE TABLE Test1
(
[Code].....