Performance Tuning :: Difference Between Move And Shrink Table?
Jul 22, 2011What is different between move table and shrink table?
View 2 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Does Shrink And Move Both Adjust The High Water Mark
Nov 4, 2013I am trying to discern the difference between Shrink and Move and their impact on the High Water Mark of a table.
My understanding is that MOVE in effect rewrites every row of a table ( hence why it can deal with row chaining ) whereas SHRINK basically moves existing rows in a table 'down' the table into any available free space. This is why MOVE takes a table lock whereas SHRINK takes a row lock. What I am trying to discern is - does MOVE and SHRINK effect the high water mark and does both reallocate space and give it back to free space for the tablespace ? I believe MOVE does reduce the HWM and give freed space back to the tablespace. I am not so sure about SHRINK.
Performance Tuning :: Difference Between Cost And Bytes
Aug 4, 2010I am working on Tuning a Materialized view. I was getting an error saying ORA-12008: error in materialized view refresh path
ORA-12801: error signaled in parallel query server P002, instance hrms-stg-db01:HRSTG1 (1)
ORA-01652: unable to extend temp segment by 16 in tablespace TEMP1.
so i increased the temp size. I am trying out various hints to get it rectified. But i am not sure if i should go for less cost or less bytes.
Performance Tuning :: Difference Between System / User Sql In Tkprof Report?
Jun 11, 2010How can i differentiate between system issued sql's and user issued sql's in the tkprof report ?
View 5 Replies View RelatedPerformance Tuning :: Difference Between Buffer_gets / Buffer_cache And Disk_reads / Physical_reads
Aug 13, 2012Is there any difference between:
1. buffer_gets/buffer_cache
2. disk_reads/physical_reads
My database is facing slow performance. When I looked into it, I found it has high buffer_gets (1388159791) and low_disk_reads (130132).
Queries are working fine, as I verified their execution plans while they are running.
Performance Tuning :: Merge Statement Tuning For 100M Records In Table?
Oct 31, 2011I have two tables with 113M records in DWH_BILL_DET & 103M in prd_rerate_chg_que and Im running following merge query, which is running for 13 hrs to update records, which is quiet longer time.
SQL> explain plan for MERGE /*+ parallel (rq, 16) */
INTO DWH_BILL_DET rq
USING (SELECT rated_que_rowid,
detail_rerate_flag_code,
rerate_sel_key,
[code].....
Performance Tuning :: Update Columns Of One Table Using Another Table
Feb 6, 2011I am trying to update columns of Table A with the columns of Table B. Both these tables have 60,000 rows each. I tried this operation using following 2 queries:
Query 1
Update TableA A
set
(A.col1,A.col2,A.col3)=(select B.col1,B.col2,B.col3
from TableB
where A.CODE=B.CODE)
Query 2
Update TableA A
set
(A.col1,A.col2,A.col3)=(select B.col1,B.col2,B.col3
from TableB
where A.CODE=B.CODE)
where exists
A.code = (select B.code
from TableB B
where A.code=B.code)
When i execute these two above queries, it keeps executing indefinitely.
Performance Tuning :: Query Doing FTS On A Big Table
Jun 24, 2011Below query is taking a long time...
select gam.SOL_ID,COUNT(gam.FORACID) from gam,smt where
gam.ACID=smt.ACID and gam.ACID NOT IN(select ACID from imt) and
gam.SCHM_TYPE in('SBA','CCA','CAA','ODA') and GAM.ACCT_CLS_FLG='N' and
gam.SOL_ID IN(select SOL_ID from IMT) group by gam.SOL_ID
/
attached is the explain plan.
in which index on IMT table is not used. And the query is doing a FTS on IMT table. What needs to be done to avoid FTS on IMT table.
Performance Tuning :: Partition Of Table
Jun 28, 2010What are the factors that decide on which column we should partition the table and which partition method we should chose.
View 2 Replies View RelatedPerformance Tuning :: Difference Between Index Rebuild And Index Rebuild Online?
Jan 10, 2011What is the difference between index rebuild and index rebuild online.
View 3 Replies View RelatedHow To Shrink Table Space
Jun 11, 2013I am trying to Shrink Table space using the following SQl. As we are dropping large datasets. Later i am trying to shrink the table space
Alter Tablespace table_name Shrink Space Keep 20M;
Is this the best way to do in oracle 11G
Performance Tuning :: Delete No Of Records From A Table
Aug 3, 2010I am using one script to delete the records from a table, its taking 1hr to delete.
declare
cursor c1 is select ownerid,ownertype from nightly_metric_projects
;
v1 c1%rowtype;
open c1;
loop
fetch c1 into v1;
exit when c1%notfound;
DELETE FROM DGT_ITEMEFFORTDATA WHERE OWNERTYPE = c1.OWNERTYPE
AND OWNERID = c1.OWNERID;
end loop;
close c1;
commit;
nightly_metric_projects--1200 records
DGT_ITEMEFFORTDATA--13200000
Performance Tuning :: Table Partitioned With Primary Key
Aug 4, 2010I have normal tables with hugh Data and would like to increase the performace by following means:
1) Add a new column in each table. Say this column Name is IS_LIVE. This new column have only two value 1 ( LIVE ) OR 0 ( NOT LIVE ).
2) Change the normal tables to Partitioned table. There would be only two partitioned in all the table. The partitioned key column would be IS_LIVE and both partitioend recrods would be in two different tablespace.
3) Added a POLICY function to these partitioned table to Always add a Query Predicate of '1' to all queuries.
I am interested to know that what kind of Indexes ( Global Or local ) would be suitable for these kind of Design.Is there any use of having Local index on IS_LIVE.Please note that Primary Key doesnot have this new column in it.
Performance Tuning :: What Does Analyzing A Table Do For Indexes
Sep 26, 2012what analyzing a table does to existing indexes? Do I need to rebuild the indexes after dbms_stats.gather_table_stats command ?
View 4 Replies View RelatedPerformance Tuning :: Table Occupying Max Size
May 9, 2011Objective : To find solution to archieve data from 2 big tables which is occupying maximum size in the data base. With current data (From Jan 2005 to Sept 2011) it has records as mentioned below:
transaction - 41687927
trnansaction_dtl - 83945934
We need to load data and run monthly batches from October 2011 to current month which will increase this space.
1. Issue is there will not be having so much space.
2. Maintenance of such table is diffcult now.Also there is huge impact on performance. Can we think of partitioning the table base on date aswe query 1st table based on certain date range?
3. Most of reports use this table and creating performances issues
Performance Tuning :: Big Table Data Maintenance
Jun 17, 2011We have few tables in our production database which are havoc in size and will increase in size in future too so as part of the corrective measures , we have jotted down the below 3 methods to manage the size of those tables :-
1> Partitioning the table and take the export of identified partitions and after that, truncate those partition.
2> Creating history tables and remove not so current data from the original table to history table.
Performance Tuning :: Remove Table Fragmentation
Dec 29, 2011I have tried below steps for removing the table fregmentation but for some table i am not getting good result here.
1. It will collect the data which are having more than 100MB fragmentation.
select owner,table_name,blocks,num_rows,avg_row_len,round(((blocks*8/1024)),2)||'MB' "TOTAL_SIZE", round((num_rows*avg_row_len
/1024/1024),2)||'Mb' "ACTUAL_SIZE", round(((blocks*8/1024)-(num_rows*avg_row_len/1024/1024)),2) ||'MB' "FRAGMENTED_SPACE" from
dba_tables where owner in('a','b','c','d') and round(((blocks*8/1024)-(num_rows*avg_row_len/1024/1024)),2)
> 100 order by 8 desc;
2. then move the object(table) to the same tablespace.
alter table abc move;
alter table bcd move;
alter table efg move;
3. also rebuild the dependent objects.
alter index abc_PK rebuild online;
4. Then analyze the table which are having more than 100MB of fragmentation.
exec dbms_stats.gather_table_stats('a','abc');
exec dbms_stats.gather_table_stats('b','bcd');
exec dbms_stats.gather_table_stats('c','cdf');
after that when check the table fragmentation, i am getting the same result, which i have collected from the 1st query.
Performance Tuning :: Stale Statistics For Table?
Apr 27, 2012From the below query i found that there are some stale stats for 3 tables.
=================================
select table_name, stale_stats, last_analyzed
from dba_tab_statistics
where owner= 'SYSADM' and stale_stats='YES'
order by last_analyzed desc
I collect stats for those above 3 tables with dbms_stats.gather_table_stats().But no luck.After collection of stats immediately I ran the above query.But still it is showing there are stale stats for 3 tables.
how can I change "STALE-STATS" status, so that optimizer can use the updated stats eficiently.
Performance Tuning :: DML Slow When Table Have Many Rows
Sep 4, 2011If a table(have a primary key) is empty(after truncate),the sql of dml(insert,update) is very quickly,but if the table have many rows about 10,000,000 rows, the dml is very slowly,why?
View 6 Replies View RelatedPerformance Tuning :: Stats On A Partitioned Table?
Aug 8, 2013Is it possible for the DBMS_STATS "LIST STALE" command to show a stale partition but NOT have its table show as stale?
I had a scenario where the table itself AND 1 partition showed as stale. I ran a fnd_stats gather table stats just on that 1 partition. Once it was completed it showed the partition to no longer be stale. it also showed that the table was no longer stale. so I guess I do not need to run stats on the whole table as well?
so if this is the case, when would I need to run stats on the full partitioned table if running it on the partitions themselves removes the staleness of the table?
Performance Tuning :: Initial Extent For Table?
Mar 19, 20121.2 million chained rows, 1.7 million blocks, etc. Initial extent for this table is 64k and next 1 mb. I would try to calculate this out better for efficiency and performance. This will not be efficient as it stands. calculate the size.
View 14 Replies View RelatedPerformance Tuning :: Managing Large Table?
Aug 26, 2011I am working with an online application with the database in Oracle 10G. We have a table with 10 million rows and this table is subjected to grow in future also. Moreover we cannot archive some of these rows as these records are required for referencing.
We have all necessary indexes on the table but querying this table takes a lot of time especially when it is joined with other tables. some methods with which I can manage this table in a better way so that queries joining this table would execute faster..
SELECT
TAB1.C6,
TAB1.C8,
TAB1.C10,
TAB3.C4,
[code]....
Server Administration :: Table Cannot Shrink?
Sep 26, 2011 My table can not shrink, why?
SQL> Alter Table tb_hxl_user Shrink Space Cascade;
Alter Table tb_hxl_user Shrink Space Cascade
*
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-10635: Invalid segment or tablespace type
SQL> desc tb_hxl_user;
Name Null? Type
----------------------------------------- -------- ----------------------------
STATEDATE NOT NULL DATE
USERNUMBER NOT NULL VARCHAR2(13)
PROVCODE NOT NULL NUMBER
[code]...
Performance Tuning :: Table Rebuild Should Be Done After Removing Most Of Its Data?
Oct 23, 2012We are on Oracle 10.2.0.4 on Solaris 10. There is a table in my production db that has 872944 number of rows. Most of its data is now unnecessary, we need to retain, based on a date column in the table just last one month's data and delete rest of the data. So after that the table will have just 3000 rows.
However as the table was huge earlier(872k rows prior to delete) , does the delete of data release its oracle blocks and does the size of the table reduce? If not, will it rebuild the table online (online redefinition) so that the query that does a full scan on this table goes faster?
I checked using an example table that just delete of data does not remove the oracle blocks - they remain in the user_tables for that table and cost of full table scan remains same. We have a query that does the full table scan so I am thinking that after this delete I should do an online table re-definition , is that the right decision?
Performance Tuning :: Insert Into Table Slows Down Query
Sep 23, 2010When i run a script that does a select from a single table (table has 33521868 records)the query is executed in about .094 seconds. I use the exact same query to insert into a temporary table and the query takes 10 minutes and more.
What should I be doing to speed up this process. Also tried using hints and it does not speed up the insert.
Performance Tuning :: Lot Of Time Being Taken To Delete Data From A Table
Apr 27, 2012I have a table which contains 8,21,177 amount of data totally.Now I am trying to delete around 4,84,000 of data from this table by using just one filter i.e. my query is something like below
DELETE /*+ parallel(resource,4) */ FROM resource where created_by = 'MIGN'
This is going to delete 4,84,000 rows of data . But my current issue is this is taking lots of time to delete the data . To be precise , its almost taking 25 hours to delete this data..The created_by column is indexed .
Execution Plan
----------------------------------------------------------
Plan hash value: 2389236532
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time
|
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 0 | DELETE STATEMENT | | 499 | 20459 | 39 (0)| 00:00:
01 |
| 1 | DELETE | RESOURCE | | | |
[code]....
Performance Tuning :: Insert Data Fast On Table
Oct 15, 2013I am inserting data using a procedure for 2012 and 2013 year which is using partitioned tables includes crore of data in a partition taking lot of time or taking months. Is there any other way by which I can insert data fast from our query.
View 14 Replies View RelatedPerformance Tuning :: How To Check Table Has Changed 10% In Database
Dec 13, 2011By default the DBMS_STATS package runs once every 24 hours to collect statistics for database objects and Oracle collects new statistics when enough of the data (about 10%) has changed.
My question here is how to check the table has changed 10% in database?
Performance Tuning :: Alternate Query Instead Of Querying Table Twice?
Nov 11, 2012The Item data for individual cycles is as below.
Item_tbl
ItemRundate StddateStatus
P103-Nov-1203-Nov-12A
P104-Nov-1204-Nov-12D
P2 04-Nov-1203-Nov-12A
The requirement is I have to get the details of all data of previous Active cycle(status A) when the Item became disabled(status = D) for Input date.
In above case,since for Item P1 and on cycle date 04-Nov-12,status is D,I have to consider the previous active cycle which is 03-Nov-12. Based on above std date,the data is queried from another table to get all the Items. Item P2 should not be considered in above case.
Below is the code which I have written which considers the rundate as Input parameter.
-- To get the Items disabled for Input date
with Itemdisabled as
(
select item,stddate maxcycledate
from Item_tbl
where rundate = stddate
[code]....
In above case,I'm querying the Item_tbl twice once for getting the disabled Items and once for getting the Previous cycle which is active.
Is there any way to query above only once and get the required results using Lag/Lead functions etc.
Performance Tuning :: How To Find Top Query Running On A Table
Feb 19, 2012How do i find a particular SQL or a set of SQL's which are excuted against a table (user identified table) that is either a very frequently executed query against that table or high impact SQL against that table? I am currently looking through the AWR reports to go through all the queries but i was wondering if there are any dictionary views where we can find this info from?
View 2 Replies View Related