Performance Tuning :: SGA-MAX-SIZE To More Than 2G?

Aug 10, 2011

I am running Oracle 10.2.0.1.0 on MS Windows 2003 server 64-bit with 16G RAM.

Here is the findings for my Oracle database.

SQL> select * * from v$sgainfo;
NAME BYTES RES
-------------------------------- ---------- ---
Fixed SGA Size 1293560 No
Redo Buffers 7094272 No
Buffer Cache Size 830472192 Yes

[code]...

I find that the SGA component "Buffer Cache" is decreasing from the start "1.8G" and down to now 0.8G. On the other hand, the component "Shared Pool" is increasing from the start 0.3G to now 1.2G. I noticed that there are 100 operations of shrinking of "Buffer cache" and growth of "Shared Pool" in Oracle every day.Is it a indicator that I should raise up the SGA_MAX_SIZE?

I tried to increase the SGA_MAX_SIZE to 4G. But I cannot start the Oracle afterward.Is it a limitation of MS Windows(OS) or Oracle?I set the SGA_MAX_SIZE to 3G. This time, I can startup Oracle.What is the optimum/maximum I can set to SGA_MAX_SIZE?Is there any adverse effect/concern when setting the SGA_MAX_SIZE more than 2G?

View 6 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Performance Tuning :: Redo Size?

Jun 18, 2012

In one of our envirnoment i could see the redo size is high.Trying to understand why this is more

View 18 Replies View Related

Performance Tuning :: Table Occupying Max Size

May 9, 2011

Objective : To find solution to archieve data from 2 big tables which is occupying maximum size in the data base. With current data (From Jan 2005 to Sept 2011) it has records as mentioned below:

transaction - 41687927
trnansaction_dtl - 83945934

We need to load data and run monthly batches from October 2011 to current month which will increase this space.

1. Issue is there will not be having so much space.

2. Maintenance of such table is diffcult now.Also there is huge impact on performance. Can we think of partitioning the table base on date aswe query 1st table based on certain date range?

3. Most of reports use this table and creating performances issues

View 30 Replies View Related

Performance Tuning :: Redo Log File Size

Apr 6, 2011

The REDO log file size is important DB performance issues when DB is run archivelog mode.If DB run noarchivelog mode, REDO log file size not impact to DB performance.

View 3 Replies View Related

Performance Tuning :: Optimal REDO Log File Size

Feb 10, 2011

I would like to make a change on the live system!I have read a book and found a information about REDO log file size is impact on DB performance.My DB current log file size is 100 MB. But, Oracle 10g's Redo Logfile Sizing Advisor offer the optimal log file size is 1845 MB.What REDO log file size is best for my Oracle database?

#Optimal log file size:
select optimal_logfile_size
from v$instance_recovery
----------------------------
OPTIMAL_LOGFILE_SIZE
1842
[code]....

View 9 Replies View Related

Performance Tuning :: Increase Few Of Columns Size In The Table

Feb 14, 2013

We have a table emp_details with 23772889 records. Our requirement is to increase few of the columns size in the table emp_details. We are following the below alter statement which is taking around 2 hours of time.

ALTER TABLE emp_details
MODIFY
(
address char(90)
,department char(30)
)
/

Is there any way to improve the above query performance?

View 2 Replies View Related

Performance Tuning :: ORA-01555 - Increase Undo Size Or Retention?

Apr 22, 2013

I have got the following error yesterday

ORA-01555 caused by SQL statement below (SQL ID: fdxcyoin67ty8t, Query Duration=380128 sec, SCN: 0x0229.ff00afd0):

following are the existing settings

SQL> show parameter undo

NAME TYPE VALUE
------------------------------------ ----------- ------------------------------
undo_management string AUTO
undo_retention integer 96000
undo_tablespace string undo

[code]....

following are the details from v$undostat

select begin_time, end_time, undotsn, undoblks, maxquerylen, maxqueryid, activeblks, unexpiredblks, expiredblks, tuned_undoretention from v$undostat
where trunc(begin_time)=trunc(sysdate)-1 order by begin_time;
BEGIN_TIME END_TIME UNDOTSN UNDOBLKS MAXQUERYLEN MAXQUERYID ACTIVEBLKS UNEXPIREDBLKS EXPIREDBLKS TUNED_UNDORETENTION
-------------- -------------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ------------- ---------- ------------- ----------- -------------------
21-04-13 00:08 21-04-13 00:18 1 12733 378446 duqnawh32hp4u 91152 7068448 225440 345600
21-04-13 00:18 21-04-13 00:28 1 8951 379047 duqnawh32hp4u 99344 7072800 225440 345600
21-04-13 00:28 21-04-13 00:38 1 14073 379650 duqnawh32hp4u 90128 7075872 234656 345600

[code]....

Following are the details in AWR report (00:00 til 01:00 of 21-Apr-2013) .... not thet the error was produced at 00:42

Undo Segment Summary DB/Inst: DBCPY/dbcpy01 Snaps: 18853-18854
-> Min/Max TR (mins) - Min and Max Tuned Retention (minutes)
-> STO - Snapshot Too Old count, OOS - Out of Space count
-> Undo segment block stats:
-> uS - unexpired Stolen, your - unexpired Released, uU - unexpired reUsed

[code]....

Undo Advisor information taken 'now' is as following

SQL> select dbms_undo_adv.longest_query(sysdate-2,sysdate) from dual;
DBMS_UNDO_ADV.LONGEST_QUERY(SYSDATE-2,SYSDATE)
----------------------------------------------
379650
SQL> select dbms_undo_adv.required_retention from dual;

[code]....

In above situation what should be my first choice (assuming increasing space is not an issue) - increase undo tablespace or increase undo retention?

If latter is the choice then what should be the value? Because as I understand present 96000 value is taken as lower limit and because of auto tuning the actual value (TUNED_UNDORETENTION) being used was 345600 In that case shall I set it to something > max(maxquerylen) i.e 379,650 + X?Or I shall increase the undo tablespace size?

From Undo Advisor output it looks to me that even if I increase the undo retention to 379650 current undo size will be able to support it (may be at the expense of DMLs)Is that right?

View 13 Replies View Related

Performance Tuning :: Tablespace With Different Block Size Inside Same Database?

Nov 25, 2011

All the analysis till now on our system proves that our system is clearly I/O bound and db sequential read is the biggest culprit.

We have even identified the index which is being affected by sequential read. I am thinking of creating a new tablespace with 32K blocksize (currently all table spaces are 8k) and migrate this index to the new space. That way, Oracle will have to do less number of reads to get the required data.

But is there anything wrong in having just one tablespace with a differnt block size? Or is there anything that I have to be watchful about while doing it?

View 14 Replies View Related

Performance Tuning :: Correct Method To Determine Table Actual Size

Aug 9, 2012

Which is the correct method to calculate actual data size in a table? becaue when I serach in google, I saw the below line.

"Oracle thumb rule says (actual space required for a table + 30 % space) will calculate the original space requirement for a table."

Method 1:

actual space = num_rows*avg_row_len

Method 2:

actual space = (Num of rows in a table) * (Avg_row_len) + ((Num of rows in a table) * (Avg_row_len)* 0.3)

View 8 Replies View Related

Performance Tuning :: Tools For Database Tuning And Instance Tuning

Jul 12, 2010

Looking to understand the difference between instance tuning and database tuning.

What is the difference between these two tuning exercises? I understand that an instance is memory based structures (logical) where as database consists of physical structures.

However, how does one tune a database the physical structure? Does it have to do with file placements/block sizes etc. Would you agree that a lot of that is taken care by ASM now in 11g? What tools are required/available (third party as well as oracle supplied) for these types of tuning scenarios?

View 1 Replies View Related

Performance Tuning :: Merge Statement Tuning For 100M Records In Table?

Oct 31, 2011

I have two tables with 113M records in DWH_BILL_DET & 103M in prd_rerate_chg_que and Im running following merge query, which is running for 13 hrs to update records, which is quiet longer time.

SQL> explain plan for MERGE /*+ parallel (rq, 16) */
INTO DWH_BILL_DET rq
USING (SELECT rated_que_rowid,
detail_rerate_flag_code,
rerate_sel_key,

[code].....

View 39 Replies View Related

Performance Tuning :: How Length Of Column Width Effects Index Performance

Sep 30, 2010

How the length of column width effects index performance?

For example if i had IOT table emp_iot with columns:
(id number,
job varchar2(20),
time date,
plan number)

Table key consist of(id, job, time)

Column JOB has fixed list of distinct values ('ANALYST', 'NIGHT_WORKED', etc...).

What performance increase i could expect if in column "job" i would store not names but concrete numbers identifying job names.
For e.g. i would store "1" instead 'ANALYST' and "2" instead 'NIGHT_WORKED'.

View 24 Replies View Related

Performance Tuning :: Fragmentation Can Reduce Performance In Query Times

Jun 16, 2010

I have a question about database fragmentation.I know that fragmentation can reduce performance in query times. The blocks are distributed in many extents and scans process takes a long time. Oracle engine have to locate the address of the next extent..

I want to know if there is any system view in which you can check if your table or index has high fragmentation. If it's needed I will have to re-create, move or rebulid the table or index, but before I want to know if the degree of fragmentation is high.

Any useful script or query to do this, any interesting oracle system view?

View 2 Replies View Related

Performance Tuning :: Method Of Tuning Database - Row Reduction?

Oct 20, 2010

There is a simple way to increase the performance of a query by reducing the row-size of the table it hits. I used it in the past by dividing the table into smaller parts and querying respective smaller table in each query.

what is this method called ? just forgot the method and can't recall it. what this type of row-reduction optimization is called ?

View 6 Replies View Related

Performance Tuning :: Performance Standard Edition Without Partitioning?

Jun 16, 2011

How many records could I have in a single table without performance degradation with Standard Edition without partitioning with cutting-edge server (8 or 12 cores, 72 GB RAM, FC 4 Gbit, etc...) and good storage?

300 Millions in only one table with 500K transactions / day is too much?

Simple database with simple schema.

How many records begin to be too many?

View 2 Replies View Related

Performance Tuning :: Procedure Performance On New Database Import?

Nov 15, 2010

Testing our 9i to 11g upgrade, we've imported the entire DB into the new machine.We've found that certain procedures are really suffering performance problems. BUT, we've also found, that if we check out a production copy of the procedure from our source code control, and reinstall it, the performance issue goes away. Just alter the procedure and recompiling does NOT work.

The new machine where the 11g database exists is slightly different than the source, but it's not like we have this problem with every procedure. It's only a couple.

any possible reason that we'd have to re-install a procedure to correct a performance problem?

View 13 Replies View Related

Performance Tuning :: Checking Delete Performance In Package

Apr 12, 2013

I need to check the package performance and need to improve the package performance.

1. how to check the package performance(each and every statement in the package)?
2. In the package using the delete statement to delete all records and observed that delete is taking long time to delete all the records in the table(Table records 7000000). This table is like staging table.Daily need to clean the data before inserting the data into it. what can I use instead of Delete.

View 13 Replies View Related

Performance Tuning :: Query Performance Gain Using Statistics?

Aug 9, 2010

Somewhere I read that we should not use hints in Oracle production environments, but we can use hints in the development environment and on achieving the desired execution plan we can adjust the 'statistics' to follow that plan without hints.

Q1. If it is true what statistics do we adjust for influencing the execution plan and how?

For example, I have the following simple query:

select e.empid, e.ename, d.dname
from emp e, dept d
where e.deptno=d.deptno;

emp.empid, emp.deptno and dep.deptno columns have indexes and the tables have the standard structure as found in the basic oracle examples.

If I look at the execution plan of the above query then I see that the driving table is empand the driven table is dept.Also the type of join that is taking place is 'Nested Loop'.

Questions: With respect to the above query,
Q 2. If I want to make dept the driving table and emp the driven table then how can I adjust the statistics to achieve that?
Q 3. If I want to use hash join instead of a nested loop join then then how can I adjust the statistics to achieve that?

I can put the ordered and the use_hash hint to effect this but again I have heard that altering statistics is a more robust way to control an execution plan as compared to hints.

View 6 Replies View Related

Performance Tuning :: How To Improve The Performance Of Export Job (expdp)

Dec 6, 2011

I have an issue with export(expdp).

When i exporting an user using expdp utility, the load the on the server is going up-to 5. The size of the database is 180GB. Below is the command that i use for export.

expdp sys/xxxx directory=dbpdump dumpfile=expdp_trk_backup.dmp logfile=expdp_trk_backup.log exclude=statistics schemas=trk

Do i need any look into any memory parameters for this?

View 1 Replies View Related

Performance Tuning :: DECODE In WHERE CLAUSE Performance?

Oct 17, 2011

The following query gets input parameter from the Front End application, which User queries to get Reports.There are many drop down boxes like LOB, FAMILY, BRAND etc., The user may or may not select values from drop down boxes.

If the user select any one or more values ( against each drop down box) it has to fetch all matching values from DB. If the user does'nt select any values it has to fetch all the records, in this case application will send a value 'DEFAULT' (which is not a value in DB ) so that the DB will fetch all the records.

For getting this I wrote a query like below using DECODE, which colleague suggested that will hamper performance.From the below query all the variables V_ are defined in procedure which gets the values selected by user as a comma separated string here V_SELLOB and LOB_DESC is column in DB.

DECODE (V_SELLOB, 'DEFAULT', V_SELLOB, LOB_DESC) IN
OPEN v_refcursor FOR
SELECT /*+ FULL(a) PARALLEL(a, 5) */
*
FROM items a
WHERE a.sku_status = 'A'

[code]...

View 9 Replies View Related

Performance Tuning :: Same Data But Different Performance Results

Sep 3, 2010

what the principal things to look at when we have for the same query different performance results are?I have 2 different bases: the plan and data are the same but performance results are very differents.

View 10 Replies View Related

Performance Tuning :: DB Performance Keys?

Mar 17, 2012

are the most important performance keys we have to calculate or take in account to preserve or to increase the DB performance in terms of response times, and whatsoever according to performance ?

View 8 Replies View Related

Performance Tuning :: Options While Using RBO?

Mar 27, 2013

I am working on an assignement where client is using Oracle 10g but stuck to using RBO Now the application team, from the GUI available to them build dynamic queries and some of them run very slow.

Neither the code can not be changed to tune the queries nor do we get the exact step in the plan which is an issue (being RBO).For some long running queries the Tuning advisor is not producing any recommendations.

Another hurdle is that all the application users are using same application user id so we can not write a logon trigger to use CBO for some particular queries to see what is happening in the background!

View 11 Replies View Related

Performance Tuning :: Next SQL Sentence

Jul 4, 2012

I want to tuning the next sql sentence. In this sql I want to get the hash_value and sql_text of the sentences that it's causing TX blocks. Is it possible?. This sentence works fine but sometimes It's slow.

SELECT DISTINCT hash_value,
sql_text
FROM gv$sql sq
WHERE hash_value IN (SELECT DISTINCT prev_hash_value
FROM gv$session se
WHERE sid IN (SELECT sid
FROM gv$lock l
WHERE type = 'TX'
AND ctime >= 2000
AND l.inst_id = se.inst_id
AND l.sid = se.sid)
AND sq.inst_id = se.inst_id);
[code]....

View 7 Replies View Related

Performance Tuning :: Different SQL ID For Same HASH-VALUE?

Nov 2, 2012

I see one of my SQL's which is ran by the user on a 10.2.0.3 database changing its SQL_ID after some runs even if the query is not changed a bit! However the HASH VALUE for this query remains the same.

how a same query can have different SQL_ID's but same HASH_VALUE?

Note: Statistics are not modified on the base tables of this query.

View 10 Replies View Related

Performance Tuning :: How To Know Host Name Using Sql ID Or SID

Jul 11, 2012

Here i have three tier application. I want to know it host name from sid or sqlid . I want to know which query run on which host. Because i have one user from application to database. So i want to know which query consume more time on which host ?

View 19 Replies View Related

Performance Tuning :: No Redo For DML?

Mar 17, 2006

How can I disable redo generation for DML statements.

View 25 Replies View Related

Performance Tuning :: Getting Enq - TS - Contention?

Jul 26, 2011

I am getting enq: TS - contention as top event in AWR Report.where can i look into database to fix this issue.

View 14 Replies View Related

Performance Tuning :: TPC-E Benchmarking

Aug 14, 2010

I want to run some OLTP benchmarks on my system. I have looked up the TPC-E benchmarking suite .. but the documentation on the site makes no sense to me .

View 1 Replies View Related

Performance Tuning :: AWR Report Evaluation

May 20, 2010

My DB is oracle10g.

I have AWR report comparison for two different days. I want to find the below things.

1. Which day has better performance?
2. What are the top two findings on the report.

I attached the report.

Here are my answer. Please correct me if i am wrong.

1. Which day has better performance? Second day has higher load. Since redosize is showing very high.
2. What are the top two findings on the report.

a) Compared to two days, first day, little bit more I/0 wait for single block read.
b) Compared to two days, 2nd day, it takes higher CPU.

However, which day is best compared to two days?

View 5 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved