There is coulmn called DATA in a table with LONG RAW datatype. we are facing more than 60% chained rows in this table because of this LONG RAW column.
It is very difficult to clean up these chained rows periodically. Since an application using this table is a business critical interms of high availability.Hence, is there any other way in oracle to avoid chained rows permanently in future?
avoid duplication of **where** clause in my query.
In my below query, **JOIN** condition is same for both the queries and **WHERE** condition also same except this clause "and code.code_name="transaction_1" In **IF ** condition only credit and debit is swapped on both queries, due to this **Credit and Debit** and this where clause "and code.code_name="transaction_1" I am duplicating the query. avoid this duplication. I am using oracle 11g
SELECT day AS business_date,
SUM(amount) AS AMOUNT,
type_amnt AS amount_type,
[Code]....
Below query is getting delayed becasue of BitMap Indexes on the table. I am trying to avoid indexes by using Hints in the query but unable to do so, Details are as follows.
explain plan for
SELECT cbu_cid, cbu_cid_customer_en_nm,
COUNT (billg_acct_no) AS billg_acct_no,
SUM (subscriber_cnt) AS subscriber_cnt
FROM daily_view
WHERE (billg_system_id = 'TM' AND mktg_sub_segment_a_nm = 'TM')
AND (cbu_cid NOT IN ('0001988048', '0001379962', '0001350469'))
GROUP BY cbu_cid, cbu_cid_customer_en_nm
HAVING SUM (subscriber_cnt) > 10
ORDER BY subscriber_cnt DESC;
[code]....
I have tried with ALL_ROWS & PARALLEL.how to avoid above two indexes in a query.
I'm an application developer of an automotive company and developing a lot of database-based applications with either oracle forms or c#.Since we've moved from a 10g rac to 11g using a shared server configuration, the prevailing and overwhelming topic of addm performance analysis is "unusual network wait event" caused by virtual circuit waits. Therefore I cannot use grid control to detect bad sql as I could in 10g anymore, because all "tunable" sql is wiped out by virtual circuit wait.In top activity, I see virtual circuit wait on every type of statement (select, insert...) and pl/sql execution.
What do I have to do as an application developer to avoid virtual circuit waits? Especially in C#: we normally use auto committed dml statements and selects to fill either a datatable or generic list with a data reader. Usually we close a connection after each statement, but/and we are using connection pooling. How can such a activity cause virtual circuit waits? In Oracle Forms: Seems that we have a virtual circuit wait if we show sorted data in a block where not all records are fetched from database. It doesn't make sense to us to rewrite all blocks to always get all records due to performance reasons.
How do I have to write and execute my statements in C#, oracle forms and/or pl/sql to avoid virtual circuit wait?
On the weekend, I ran the repair chained rows in Toad and compile invalid objects in Toad.I don't know this problem is associated with that job, it has no problem first day and today some problem was detected from customer side. It shows Ora-12516 and Ora-96512, I will attach package sql and error screen shot, could you interpret what is wrong with the Oracle?
I can post up screen shot cause I don't have right.It was Korean and if I translate to English, kind of "Server can't proceed - Ora-12516 TNS: listener can't find appropriate handler with protocol stack.
Ora-06512: "CWMED.PKG_MEDI_AS_TOCALL" line 226
Ora-06512: "CWMED.PKG_PDA_MEDI_AS" line 1765
Ora-06512: "line 1".
I'm trying to write a query that counts how many sessions are active during a 1 second time interval, then returns the maximum number of sessions active during any time interval, and all the time intervals that hit that max.
Here's a sample of the inner query results:
"INTERVAL_VALUE""SESSIONS"
"13:14:47" 13
"13:14:52" 13
"13:14:54" 13
"13:19:05" 4
"13:19:28" 4
[code]....
The max(sessions) is 13, so what I want the final output to be is:
"INTERVAL_VALUE""SESSIONS"
"13:14:47" 13
"13:14:52" 13
"13:14:54" 13
Here is the create sql for the test data:
CREATE TABLE "SESSION_TABLE"
(
"SESSIONKEY" NUMBER,
"SESSION_START_TIME" TIMESTAMP,
"SESSION_END_TIME" TIMESTAMP,
CONSTRAINT "PK_SESSIONKEY" PRIMARY KEY ("SESSIONKEY")
);
[code]....
Here is my query that works:
SELECT
maxval.interval_value,
allval.sessions,
licenselimit
FROM
(SELECT
[code]....
If a table(have a primary key) is empty(after truncate),the sql of dml(insert,update) is very quickly,but if the table have many rows about 10,000,000 rows, the dml is very slowly,why?
View 6 Replies View Related1) I have 5 Exported Dump files.
2) All of those 5 dump files were taken in different time periods.
3) Many of those Dump files are having the same Partition records.
eg:-
Dump 1:- 01-06-2010 to 31-11-2010
Dump 2:- 01-09-2010 to 31-12-2010
4) Now i want to import all those partitioning data into a single table, without having any duplication.
Our application servers will be running a SELECT which returns zero rows all the time.This SELECT is put into a package and this package will be called by application servers very frequently which is causing unnecessary CPU.
Original query and plan
SQL> SELECT SEGMENT_JOB_ID, SEGMENT_SET_JOB_ID, SEGMENT_ID, TARGET_VERSION
FROM AIMUSER.SEGMENT_JOBS
WHERE SEGMENT_JOB_ID NOT IN
(SELECT SEGMENT_JOB_ID
FROM AIMUSER.SEGMENT_JOBS) 2 3 4 5 ;
[code]....
Which option will be better or do we have other options?They need to pass the column's with zero rows to a ref cursor.
I am trying to update a million rows in one table with the values from another tables.
Table being updated CI_ADJ_CHAR column CHAR_VAL_FK1
Table from which values will be used CK_ADJ columns (cx_id, ci_id)
The CI_ADJ_CHAR.CHAR_VAL_FK1 values match CK_ADJ.CX_ID and should be updated with the value CK_ADJ.CI_ID.
The CK_ADJ table has 1.3 million rows and both the columns have indexes defined. Table definitiuon mentioned below
The CI_ADJ_CHAR table has 14 million rows and will update 1 million rows and has an index on the ADJ_ID column but not on the CHAR_VAL_FK1 column.
Is there any way i can Get how many rows are processing with UPDATE statement while the Update statement is still running.
View 2 Replies View RelatedWhere filter middle_rows save before join and grop by operation?
It is save rows in PGA Private SQL Area or save blocks in SGA databuffer?
I have one table in which I want to restrict some records from being inserted. I don't want to put any checked constraints. e.g. consider following table
transaction(
id number primary key,
txn_date timestamp(7),
payee varchar2(40),
amount number,
memo varchar2(40),
ref_num number
)
I want to write SQL which should not inset duplicate record.
e.g.
I have written one as bellow:
insert into transaction
select 1, to_date('2009-12-12','YYYY-MM-DD'), 'Payee1', 12, 'Test', 212 from dual where
(select count(*) from transaction where txn_date=to_date('2009-12-12','YYYY-MM-DD') and
payee='Payee1' and amount=12)=0;
Can I use exists/not exists, which query will be more appropriate. (Please consider that fields which I am using to filter out the duplicate transactions does not contain primary key.)
Can I write such SQL. Or do i check for duplicate rows one by one and then filter the duplicate records.
I have installed database in one server. I would like to enable AWR into it. Statistics_level is set to Typical. While running the below script to enable the AWR, its gives error -
SQL> exec dbms_scheduler.enable('GATHER_STATS_JOBS');
BEGIN dbms_scheduler.enable('GATHER_STATS_JOBS'); END;
*
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-27476: "SYS.GATHER_STATS_JOBS" does not exist
ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_ISCHED", line 4343
ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_SCHEDULER", line 2802
ORA-06512: at line 1
make AWR automatical generation.
I am running an Oracle 10.2.0.3 on Solaris 5.9 OS. Front end appplication is PeopleSoft v8.8.From my AWR report I have found below SQL which needs to be tuned:
SELECT TO_CHAR (TO_DATE (TO_CHAR (B.ASOFDATE, 'YYYY-MM-DD'), 'yyyy-mm-dd'),
'dd/mm/yyyy'),
B.EMPLID,
B.PWCUK_LEGACY_ID,
B.NAME,
[code]...
Looking to understand the difference between instance tuning and database tuning.
What is the difference between these two tuning exercises? I understand that an instance is memory based structures (logical) where as database consists of physical structures.
However, how does one tune a database the physical structure? Does it have to do with file placements/block sizes etc. Would you agree that a lot of that is taken care by ASM now in 11g? What tools are required/available (third party as well as oracle supplied) for these types of tuning scenarios?
Recently i have been working analyzing Oracle Row Chaining and Migration in the database. Is their any way to track the chaining & migration of rows as part of database health checkup.
Else we have analyze the table for detecting row Chaining and Migration.
We are re-designing our App and we have a critical question, what's the best way (in terms of performance) of using TIFF images (about 20K size) with Oracle.
Currently we have a Windows shared file server and we create the tiff images there under a huge directory structure (like /images/ddddmmyy/aa/bb/001, then /images/ddddmmyy/aa/bb/002, etc, etc). Our database is usually in LINUX version 10, 11 or 12. We create about 200,000 images per day, keep them for 60 days and then remove that structure.
Our Web app (developed with .NET) reads those images just to display them on a Web Session (IE).As you can see, what we are doing now works fine. But network sometimes is an issue and also it's hard to keep synchronization with our DR server, backups, etc.
Are we taking the correct approach? It would be better to have the images in CLOB or BLOBS for better performance? If so, As I mentioned, performance is the KEY FACTOR and the most important item to consider in this design.
I am querying a table having 6 million records,It takes arround 35 seconds in command line terminal using putty in a windows client.
Also the server is linux centos with oracle 11g installed. I saw the method Oracle result_cache which i am suspecting to be fast
my query is
"select /*+ result_cache */ * from relationshipobject;"
SQL> set autotrace traceonly stat
SQL> set timi on
[Code]....
i can i reduce my query execution time and consistent gets?
how do you limit oracle redo?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have a table "NEWS_COMMENT" like this:
Name Type
------- --------------
ID NUMBER(8)
USERID NUMBER(8)
SORT_TEXT VARCHAR2(100)
TEXT VARCHAR2(1000)
DATE DATE
VALID VARCHAR2(1)
CODNEW NUMBER(10)
The table has a normal index for the userid column.
There is a query that looks for the differents CODNEW for a USERID but allways the CODNEW has to be greater than 2248833
select codnew from news-comment where userid=2914655 and valid='N' and codnew>2248833
I have created a new index for this kind of querys
create index coment_new_IDX on news_comment
(CASE WHEN codnew >2248833 and valid='N' THEN userid ELSE NULL END )
but oracle doesn't use it. I have used a hint to force it but doesn't run.
We have a data migration scripts written for oracle. Data is not huge but we are observing that the migration is faster in the development labs but is 5x slower in the production site.
The development Oracle setup is on Windows and Production setup on Solaris. I have attached the AWR generated for a period where migration was run for 3 hours and stopped due to slow performance.
Here is my initial analysis.
1) The first timed events is the DB CPU. Hence I feel the migration scripts can be modified to run in parallel so that they can finish faster. However here the question arises why it should run faster in development env if this is an issue.
2) I tried increasing the
a.large_pool_size set to 512M
b.sga_max_size set to 8G
c.sga_target set to 8G
from 0, 4G and 4G respectively.
I have attached the AWR and below are the etc/system contents for solaris settings.
* Begin MDD root info (do not edit)
rootdev:/pseudo/md@0:0,1,blk
* End MDD root info (do not edit)
set noexec_user_stack=1
set noexec_user_stack_log=1
* IBMdpo vpath_START (do not remove)
* default SCSI timeout is 60 seconds
* uncomment to change SCSI timeout * set sd:sd_io_time=0x1e
forceload: drv/vpathdd
* IBMdpo vpath_END (do not remove)
set noexec_user_stack=1
set semsys:seminfo_semmni=100
set semsys:seminfo_semmns=1024
set semsys:seminfo_semmsl=256
set semsys:seminfo_semvmx=32767
set shmsys:shminfo_shmmax=4294967295
set shmsys:shminfo_shmmin=1
set shmsys:shminfo_shmmni=100
set shmsys:shminfo_shmseg=10
P.S. The awr report is renamed to .txt from .html to be able to upload the file.
I am building a database to store call quality statistics for VOIP networks. It is a very insert heavy application, and data reliability is of relatively minimal importance (in the sense that a few corrupt call records here and there doesn't matter the way corruption does in for example a banks database). Long term storage is also unimportant, most customers only wish to keep 3 months of data readily available in the database. Most do not even archive the older data.
To that end I am searching for every possible way to improve my insert performance and the internet has turned me onto the idea of NOLOGGING. These are the steps I have taken to reduce my IO consumed by the Redo and Undo logs.
1. I am inserting with the APPEND_VALUES hint.
2. I have disabled force logging at the database level
3. I have disabled force logging at the tablespace level
4. I have disabled logging on the relevant table and each of its indices
As best I can tell this is all I can do to minimize Redo/Undo, but based on my observations of the Disk portion of the WinServer2008 Performance Monitor, this has made little to no change in the amount of IO to my REDO and UNDO files. IO to the .dbf containing my table makes up less than 20% of the total disk IO for oracle.exe, the rest is the REDO and UNDO logs.
asktom.oracle.com/pls/asktom/f?p=100:11:0::::P11_QUESTION_ID:897564200346274711
The above article is a little over my head but I am able to extract from it that I will never entirely eliminate REDO/UNDO, which is fine, but I would think I could get it lower than it currently is.ted.
Here, let me explain:
I have create a table with 8 million records and 2 different indexes using 2 different columns (columns name NUM1 & NUM2) on that table. First indexed column (NUM1) values have many different values (1,2,3... etc).
Second indexed column (NUM2) values have only 2 different values.
7999999 records values is same("A") and remaining one record values is different("B").
Query1:
select * from tbl where num1=val
Query2:
select * from tbl where num2='B'
I have compare explain plan both queries, but Query2 doesn't use predefined index. Why Oracle don't use my redefined index at column NUM2?
Oracle UNION ALL performance issue: when I try to run below SQL query separately SQL part1 and SQL part2 it takes some seconds only but if I run together with group by and without group by it take much time.
SELECT AVG(date_completed-login_date),to_char(to_date(login_date), 'YYYY') as wYear FROM
(
SELECT test.date_completed 'date_completed',sample.login_date 'login_date')
FROM sample test
where (some conditions) ) ---SQL part 1
UNION ALL
[code]...
I have a query optimized as to it indexes and others runs immediately when the answer is few records in SQL Server such as Oracle, however when the result is large eg 20,000 records all data access times are very diferent. The query returns many fields (about 20) and some of them are of type Varchar 250 and some of 2000 I understand here may be the problem, but not is because for similar results (20,000 records) sql run in 2 seconds and Oracle but it responds little to have full data takes around 30 seconds. The problem is really in bringing information to all these fields since if the inquiry it also but only returning a numeric field is done in 2 seconds. Tests I've done them both through ODBC, in the Toad as in the own Oracle console on the server, so it is not problem Driver or flow of data through the network, I would like to think that this is some of the settings I think there is as much difference between Oracle and Sql. The databases are ORACLE 10 and SQL Server 2008.
View 1 Replies View RelatedA coworker of mine asked if there was any documentation from Oracle that listed all of the parts of the AWR report and what each meant. I was taken back because I don't think there is. There are third party books that talk about AWR reports and their predecessor Statspack reports.
Oracle has some notes on their support site about reading an AWR or Statspack report. All I found in the official documentation was some basic information about how to run an AWR report and an overview of what it was. It would be nice to have some sort of documentation that lists out each section and explains the units and purpose.
I am aware that from 11g, memory_target is sufficient for memeory management between SGA and PGA.
what happens if MEMORY_TARGET set to non-zero and SGA_TARGET set to zero values in a 11g database? Does it enable automatic memory management within the SGA?
We regularly hit by ORA-4031 errors. Also, memory_target advisory (v$memory_target_advice) does not show any advisory information.
for eg:
memory_max_target = 500m
memory_target = 500m
and
sga_max_size=500m
sga_target=0
We have a query which makes Oracle behave very strangely. It is a straight-forward join between four tables of about 30.000 rows each, with some simple comparisons and some NOT LIKE:s.
When we run this query, it either takes about 1 second or more than 1.000 seconds to run and return the approximately 5.000 rows of the result. If we run the same query over and over again, it fluctuates back and forth between two different execution plans, apparently at random, 3 times out of 4 selecting the 1.000 second version and 1 time out of 4 the 1 second version.
There are no other connections to the database, the schema is not modified, the data is identical, the query is identical, and the response is identical, but the execution time alternates between 1 second and 1.000 seconds.On the same database instance we have another schema which is identical, but with slightly less data, which is used for development. The 1.000 second run times did not happen in that schema, but only in the test system's database.
Therefore we would REALLY like to understand what happens and why, so that we can avoid triggering this in the future. We could try locking the 1 second execution plan, but then we're afraid of doing the same thing wrong again in the future.
Here are the two execution plans that Oracle switches between, more or less at random:
Rows (1st) Rows (avg) Rows (max) Row Source Operation
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------------------------------------------------
5455 5455 5455 HASH JOIN (cr=15663 pr=10536 pw=0 time=855673 us cost=82273 size=2707430769293 card=14028138701)
79272 79272 79272 TABLE ACCESS FULL GROUPS (cr=1008 pr=0 pw=0 time=22154 us cost=277 size=10693 card=289)
[code]...
Rows (1st) Rows (avg) Rows (max) Row Source Operation
---------- ---------- ---------- ---------------------------------------------------
5455 5455 5455 HASH JOIN (cr=15664 pr=0 pw=0 time=778178696 us cost=30838477 size=741611997206725 card=3842549208325)
375411 375411 375411 TABLE ACCESS FULL GROUP_GROUPS_FLAT (cr=3782 pr=0 pw=0 time=51533 us cost=1029 size=25152738 card=375414)
[code]...
The query:
select g.ucid, a.ucid
from account a, groups g, group_members gm, group_groups_flat ggf
where a.ucid = gm.ucid_member
and gm.ucid_group = ggf.ucid_member
[code]...
And excerpts from the schema:
CREATE TABLE "PDB"."GROUPS"
(
"UCID" VARCHAR2(256 BYTE),
"UNIX_GID" NUMBER(*,0),
[...]
[code]...
I have a question regarding memory parameters in oracle database 9.2.0.8, especially sga_max_size and db_cache_size. Database server has 32G of ram. Oracle parameter on server shmmax is set to 16G. Is reasonable to set sga_max_size to the same value, and db_cache_size to 80% of that size?
View 2 Replies View Related