I have an Oracle 10g RAC (10.2.0.3.0) environment installed on windows 2003 server. The last few months I deal with a very strange problem. From time to time some table (not always the same) is extended till it gets all of the remaining capacity of the tablespace for NO REASON at all. What I mean is that when I check the DB in the morning I see that one table has too many extents while the amount of the data is too little. On the other hand, I cannot imagine that the application could insert billions of records in this table, and then delete them.
I was about to move some tables from one table space to another but it seems it is not possible to move partitioned tables between table spaces of different block sizes.
So far the only option I have is to export and then import back the data.
know if there is any way to move a partitioned table between table spaces of different block size?
I have a requirement to import text files which are generated from 3d modelling software xsteel where it records all geometric information and i want to import this information into oracle table.
primary key constraint on transaction_dtl_bk is affecting the insertion of next correct rows.
CREATE OR REPLACE PROCEDURE NP_DB.san_po_nt_wnpg_1 ( dt DATE ) IS v_sql_error VARCHAR2 (100); -- added by sanjiv v_sqlcode VARCHAR2 (100); ---- added by sanjiv added by sanjiv
There is an interface table and there is an normal transcational table..interface table is being compared with normal table and if match found the result is dumped into another normal table.
I am using two cursors one is to query the interface table and in a for loop pass the results to the second cursor..The interface table is having 5000 + rows and the transcation table is having more than 3.7 millions ..and the program is taking lots of time to execute..took almost 35-45 minutes..
creating an sql script that can update info from one table in dbase1 to another table in dbase2 that has the same columns and if possible insert date and time in one column when the synchronized is done?
I am trying to execute dynamic SQL in Stored Function and I don't know how to do this.
Explanation:
In the function I am calling pr_createtab is procedure which will create a physical table and return the table name in the out variable v_tbl_nm.
I need to query on this dynamic table and return the result as return result. But i am not able to do it.
Here T_web_loylty_report_table is a type.
CREATE OR REPLACE function CDW_DSS.f_ReturnTable(i_mrkt_id in number, i_cmpgn_year in number) return T_web_loylty_report_table is v_tbl_nm varchar2(50); i_cntry_cd varchar2(20); v_sql_str varchar2(32567); [code]......
We have to load 10 million rows in a table from another table based on the multiple joins. How much tablespace size we allocate to the table and for performance point of view how much should be the SGA size.
We have a table in the client database that has two columns - column parent and column child. The whole hierarchy of DB table dependencies is held in this table.If Report 1 is dependent on Table A and Table A in turn is dependent on two tables Table M and Table N. Table N is dependent on table Z it will appear in the db table as,
Hierarchy Table Parent Child Report1Table A Table ATable M Table ATable N Table NTable Z
Requirement :
From the above structure, we need to build a table which will hold the complete hierarchy by breaking it into multiple columns.The o/p should look like this
-ParentChild 1Child 2 Child 3 -Report1Table ATable M -Report1Table ATable N Table Z
Child 1, Child 2, Child 3 ....and so on are columns.The number of tables and the no of hierarchical relationships are dynamic.
SQL Statements to create hierarchy table:
create table hierarchy (parent varchar2(20), child varchar2(20)); insert into hierarchy values ('Report1','Table A'); insert into hierarchy values ('Report1','Table B'); insert into hierarchy values ('Table A','Table M'); insert into hierarchy values ('Table B','Table N'); insert into hierarchy values ('Report2','Table P'); insert into hierarchy values ('Table M','Table X'); insert into hierarchy values ('Table N','Table Y'); insert into hierarchy values ('Report X','Table Z');
Approached already tried :
1) Using indentation : select lpad(' ',20*(level-1)) || to_char(child) P from hierarchy connect_by start with parent='Report1' connect by prior child=parent;
2)Using connect by path function : select * from (select parent,child,level,connect_by_isleaf as leaf, sys_connect_by_path(child,'/') as path from hierarchy start with parent='Report1' connect by prior child =parent) a where Leaf not in (0);
Both the approaches give the information but the hierarchy data appears in a single column.Ideally we would like data at each level to appear in a different column.
Insert into rent(customer_id) values (1); Insert into rent(customer_id) values (2); Insert into rent(customer_id) values (3); Insert into rent(customer_id) values (4); [code]...
Now my requirement is i need to assign doc_num from doc_id table to 4 customers in rent table randomly. I mean update doc_num in rent table from doc_id table randomly. how to write update statement.
There is a requirement to make a table data in a database (eg: HR database) available in another database (eg: EMP database), instead of accessing it using database link. In EMP database(where data needs to be cloned), data will only be queried and no write operation will be done. Data in remote database (eg: HR DATABASE) will be occassionally fully truncated and reinserted. The plan is to do a similar truncate and reinsert of data (from HR database) into EMP database monthly once using dbms scheduler job. So basically data in just one table needs to be cloned in another database.
Question: For this situation, is a regular table or Materialized view the right choice to clone the table in EMP database and why? The table in HR database (remote database) is not very big.
1.Is it necessary to reorganize a table and index after the deletion of records from table ? Because i see some change in table size after table and index reorganization.
2.Will re org table and index improve the database performance ?
Oracle 11gI have a large table of 125 million records - t3_universe. This table never gets updated or altered once loaded, but holds data that we receive from a lead company. I need to select records from this large table that fit certain demographic criteria and insert those into a smaller table - T3_Leads - that will be updated with regard to when the lead is mailed and for other relevant information. select records from this 125 million record table to insert into the smaller table.
I have tried a variety of things - views, materialized views, direct insert into smaller table...I think I am probably missing other approaches. My current attempt has been to create a View using the query that selects the records as shown below. Then use a second query that inserts into T3_Leads from this View V_Market. This is very slow. Can I just use an Insert Into T3_Leads with this query - it did not seem to work with the WITH clause? My Index on the large table is t3_universe_composite and includes zip_code, address_key, household_key.
CREATE VIEW V_Market asWITH got_pairs AS ( SELECT /*+ INDEX_FFS(t3_universe t3_universe_composite) */ l.zip_code, l.zip_plus_4, l.p1_givenname, l.surname, l.address, l.city, l.state, l.household_key, l.hh_type as l_hh_type, l.address_key, l.narrowband_income, l.p1_ms, l.p1_gender, l.p1_exact_age, l.p1_personkey, e.hh_type as filler_data, 1.p1_seq_no, l.p2_seq_no , ROW_NUMBER () OVER ( PARTITION BY l.address_key ORDER BY l.hh_verification_date DESC ) AS r_num FROM t3_universe e JOIN t3_universe l ON l.address_key = e.address_key AND l.zip_code = e.zip_code AND l.p1_gender != e.p1_gender
I want to do an import of a table from my old dump file.The same table is already there in the development box but few more columns are added to that table while testing so in the dump those columns are not available.
TABLE_EXISTS_ACTION=TRUNCATE The new table SQL> desc "TESTINVENTORY"."TTRANSACTION" Name Null? Type ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------- -------------------------------------------------------- TRANSACTIONIDNOT NULL CHAR(26) BRANCHCODE NOT NULL CHAR(3) EXTERNALSYSTEM NOT NULL CHAR(3) EXTRACTSYSTEM NOT NULL CHAR(3) OWNERBRANCHCODE NOT NULL CHAR(3) TRADEREFERENCE NOT NULL CHAR(20) [code]...
I have got two tables emp_dtl and iou_tab. i have already made entries i.e booking no, emp_cd, emp_name etc in emp_dtl snc its my master table. I want to retrieve the booking nos through lov in iou_tab which are generated in emp_dtl and corresponding info of emp_cd and emp_name should come in the respected fields in iou_tab.
I stumbled about some weird 11gR2 behavior (running on AIX).When I performed a join between a table with user based content (parts belonging to an sourcing scope) and a base table (parts available) whereas the parts have to fulfill a special regular expression, it showed that the same query is faster when using outer join than inner join (about 0.7sec vs. 20sec; which makes me believe that regexp_like works wrong when involved in an inner join).
i tried the same statement with a standard like (but not fulfilling the same condition).This time performance was as expected (inner join outperforming outer join).
Oracle version information Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.2.0 - 64bit Production PL/SQL Release 11.2.0.2.0 - Production CORE 11.2.0.2.0 Production TNS for IBM/AIX RISC System/6000: Version 11.2.0.2.0 - Production NLSRTL Version 11.2.0.2.0 - Production [code]...
I can see it, the execution plan for the "inner join" doesn't show so much more costs than the one for the outer (but why at all is does an inner join cost more?) ...The execution plan for both "not like" is the same and (surprisingly ;-) ) similar to "outer-regexp".
I hope sample data are not needed as there would be needed a lot...this is the second time I came across the "plan worse but execution time better" phenomenon.
I have a table that has 2 columns of type nested table. Now in the purge process, when I try to truncate or drop a partition from this table, I get error that I can't do this (because table has nested tables). how I will be able to truncate/drop partition from this table? IF I change column types from nested table to varray type, will it work?
Also, is there any short method of moving existing data from a nested table column to a varray column (having same fields as nested table)?
select * from test_1 IDNameTotal ----------- 1A100 2B100 3C100 4D100
test_2 table contains the concatination of ID's with comma seperated. Actually in this table ID column is of datatype varchar2. select * from test_2 ID ---- 1,2,3
My requirement is to select the data from test_1 table where the id values in this table exists in test_2 table. I tried with the belowselect statement, but could not get any data.
SELECT * FROM test_1 WHERE to_char(id) IN (SELECT id FROM test_2)
create table test_1 (id number, name varchar2(100), total number) create table test_2(id varchar2(100)) insert into test_1 values (1,'A',100) insert into test_1 values (2,'B',100) insert into test_1 values (3,'C',100) insert into test_1 values (4,'D',100)
My scenario is I need to insert into History table when a record is been updated into a tabular form(insert the updated record along with the additional columns Action_by,Action_type(Like Update or delete) and Action Date Into History table i.e History table contains all the records as the main table which is been visible in tabular form along with these additional columns ...Action_by,action_type and action_date.
So now i dont want to create a befor/after update trigger on base table rather i would like to create a generic procedure which will insert the updated record into history table taking the page alias and pade ID as the parameters(GENERIC procedure is nothing but whcih applies to all the tabular forms(Tables) contained int he application ).
if a table contains two columns and both are part of the primary key of that table (Kind of obvoius).
should i opt for a index organized tbale in this case ?Or should i opt for another running sequential colum which would serve as a primary key of this table and define the actual two columns of the system as unique keys.
there is a drawback if a most of the tables of a database contain composite primary keys?
I need to insert data in Table A from Table B where most of the fields are identical and might some of the fields will be more in Table A.
ex: Table A: a,b,c,d,e,f Table B: a.b,c,g,h
How to insert this using user_tab_columns in cursor and if I am giving the i/P as my table names . This needs to be configurable and reusable rather i mention all the fields in my logic.
I am trying to update columns of Table A with the columns of Table B. Both these tables have 60,000 rows each. I tried this operation using following 2 queries:
Query 1
Update TableA A set (A.col1,A.col2,A.col3)=(select B.col1,B.col2,B.col3 from TableB where A.CODE=B.CODE)
Query 2 Update TableA A set (A.col1,A.col2,A.col3)=(select B.col1,B.col2,B.col3 from TableB where A.CODE=B.CODE) where exists A.code = (select B.code from TableB B where A.code=B.code)
When i execute these two above queries, it keeps executing indefinitely.
I am trying to join column names from a table with data from a different table. I think i should be able to pass the parameter to a 'select list' in a query. Look at my sample data below. And the data in sales table can grow till 15 rows and similarly corresponding columns in saleshist.
I am having trouble retrieving the Max, latest date, from a table with a join to one another table and other fields from both.I was able to get the MAX service_date grouped by id. But once I tried to add more fields to the query and another table it won't work.
Here is what I have:
selectMAX(cs.service_date), cs.notes, cs.applicant_id,wr.program_code,wr.last_name,wr.first_name,wr.region_code,wr.status_cd from cs join wr on cs.applicant_id=wr.applicant_id where wr.status_cd='AC' group by cs.applicant_id
